Good article, although Barron tends to try to make too many comparisons between UH and Texas/A&M that most reporters do. Wish that he would have included more Tech stats since that’s really what our competition is right now when it comes to the P5…unless we can get access to the PUF.
Still, what I got out of the article is that our situation isn’t as dire as what most try to make it out to be. There are also some interesting financial tidbits in there.
As an alumnus, Pezman is uniquely qualified to understand the mindset of UH fans and, perhaps as importantly, to harness that energy in a way that will enable the school to keep pace as best it can with the spending race in hopes that a future realignment of the major conferences will provide access to larger revenue streams.
“It’s an aspirational thing,” he said. “There are teams at the highest level of what you intend to do, so you’re always striving to be better. It fuels fires around here, not just within me but within the administration and the institution.
“There’s a lot of ‘want to’ around here.”
It also competes well on the playing field against conference foes, ranking second to Connecticut as of mid-April in the annual Learfield Cup all-sports standings.
Note: With Baseball, Softball, and T&F’s success, the Coogs actually finished as the top American Athletic School in the Learfield Cup and 72nd overall. In Texas, we finished behind Texas (7th), A&M (11th), Baylor (45th), Texas Tech (54th), and TCU (57th)…realize that almost all P5 schools have more sports than UH does (Texas Tech has the same).
In the AAC, Houston finished with 301 points while 2nd place UCF finished with 230 points, which is a pretty big spread. Coogs had a really good year athletically.
http://www.nacda.com/directorscup/nacda-directorscup-current-scoring.html