That’s so bizarre he would say that and then leave us in the same spot and move Cincy down. I think he’s too hung up on an old notion that just by virtue of having a soft OOC you have to go above and beyond. One of the committee members came out and said that “OOC SOS” by itself is a ranking the committee pays little attention to if at all now. Lunardi’s right that we have to make up for it because there were less opportunities to get meaningful wins, and we’ve done that. We have 5 RPI top 50 wins, 8 RPI top 100 wins and we’re top 30 in BPI, RPI and Ken Pom. There are a few teams he has ahead of us that I don’t understand at all. For example, he has Louisville ahead of us and they are lower than us in all three of those ranking systems, have 1 rpi top 50 win and 5 rpi top 100 wins. Ultimately we’ll see when the seeds come out, but if the selection were today I’d be shocked if we are lower than a 9 and I’d guess 7-8. With a win at Temple on Sunday I’d have us at like a 5 seed probably.