This is as good a place as any to show an example of what a real playoff for 2017 would have looked like. The teams were selected using a methodology “based on”, but not exactly the same as, DII uses for football.
Background: I organized the schools into geographic regions. it was tough to do for the West region because there aren’t that many schools in the “West” so to get a balanced number of teams in reach region, the West has some teams you think ought to be in the Central. I did not cherry pick. I took the teams that were logically in the central but who had the most western longitude (had to look it up) and put them in the west. That’s why UT, OU, and UTSA are in the West but Nebraska, OSU, and TCU are in the Central.
From there, I computed each teams Overall win% vs FBS opponents, win% vs opponents in their region(I may drop this criterion as it skews some school’s results. WV is in the Northeast region but all of it’s conference opponents are in the Central or West), Strength of Schedule (Opponents average win% + Opponents opponents average win%), Road record vs FBS, Win% vs FBS opponents with win% > .500 (so a win vs a 6-6 team doesn’t count for this criteria).
The win % excludes conference championship games (under a methodology like this they are irrelevant) and bowl games.
I know it’s not perfect, probably far from it. The point here isn’t for you to rip apart the many flaws in the methodology I used but to show that any methodology other than a bunch of people in a smoked filled room yields a bracketology the winner of which could not be reasonably disputed as the national champion. Why the NCAA doesn’t do this is a manifestation of their corruption imho.
Here are the brackets by region.
CENTRAL - 1 G5 TEAM
1 WIS vs BYE
2 OSU vs 7 LSU
3 TCU vs 6 KSU
4 MEM vs 5 NW
NORTHEAST - 1 G5 TEAM
1 THE OSU vs BYE
2 ND vs 7 BC
3 PSU vs 6 ICH
4 MSU vs 5 TOL
SOUTHEAST - 2 G5 TEAMS
1 UCF vs BYE
2 CLEM vs 7 AUB
3 MIAMI vs 6 FAU
4 UGA vs 5 ALA
WEST - 3 G5 TEAMS
1 OU vs BYE
2 SDSU vs 7 WSU
3 USC vs 6 FRESNO
4 WASH vs 5 BOISE
Would having a shot at a real playoff improve attendance? I have to think so. Right now, even if you’re P5, after that 2nd loss, what’s the point? Scheduling changes would have to be made. A 10 game regular season makes sense with no conference championship game (team with best record in conference is the champ, so yeah, maybe we have co-champs). Playoff would add 4 or 5 games depending on whether you start with a bye or not. That’s 14 or 15 games which isn’t ridiculous.