You mean like polio?
When it comes to vaccine mandates though, the USSC has held otherwise, and upheld them, even with respect to private citizens.
Not according to our USSC. Public well being trumps individual rights.
India, South Africa, Latin American countries, the UK is now considering it as well as Israel. One of the main advantages of these two medications is that they cost close to nothing.
For you NRGcoog:
Show me .Per your article Chris it says :
While the therapy is already being used routinely for the treatment of Covid-19 in some countries, there is not yet enough data from large-scale, randomized, controlled clinical trials available to validate its effect on recovery speed or decreasing hospitalization.
norb because of the type of post that you create this is going to get this thread shut down. Please refrain yourself from further outbursts. Furthermore if Ivermectin and HCQ work in the early stages and cost nearly nothing this is FANTASTIC NEWS for everyone.
Chris don’t tell me what I can and can’t do. My body my choice of typing.
This thread was doomed when the subject was written.
100% agree.
The biggest “IF” of the day ! And HCQ has already been shown to not pass scrutiny over a year ago. Over a year .
Posting statements like this, with false hope information, that can have life or death consequences, is very irresponsible IMHO.
We are going to find out. Aren’t we?
Either get the vaccine… Or don’t… Sheesh. It was so easy to predict that we’d end up here with the state forcing vaccinations by stripping individuals of their livelihoods through discrimination.
You should be able to work and travel as long as you show a negative test… But the pro-vax mob already has their torches lit.
Public health versus personal freedom doesn’t have to be a zero sum game but one has more potential for damage than the other. Lots more!
Yeah… It’s the weak-minded people questioning the vax…
That article says the highest educated group showed the least change in hesitancy.
But show me what percent of the highly educated group have been vaccinated? The
article avoids providing that crucial piece of information. Is it 95 % and still at 95% .
85 and still stuck on 85 ? And how large is this highly educated group ?
Update:
Educational Status
High school or less (referent) 64.6 (63.2–66.0) 71.0 (69.8–72.2) 47.7 (45.2–50.2) 57.3 (55.2–59.4) 73.3 (71.4–75.2) 78.4 (76.7–80.0) 87.1 (85.3–88.7) 89.0 (87.2–90.6)
Some college or college graduate 78.2 (77.3–79.1)* 81.5 (80.7–82.2)* 71.9 (70.5–73.4)* 76.3 (75.1–77.5)* 82.4 (81.4–83.4)* 84.7 (83.9–85.5)* 91.7 (90.8–92.5)* 93.0 (92.2–93.7)*
Above college graduate 90.8 (90.1–91.6)* 92.4 (91.6–93.1)* 87.6 (86.3–88.9)* 89.7 (88.4–91.0)* 92.3 (91.3–93.3)* 93.8 (92.8–94.6)* 95.6 (94.5–96.5)* 96.1 (95.1–97.0)*
This study, over 1 million+ people sample size, found that the least educated group of people were the least hesitant and the most educated group were the most hesitant.
At least according to these PhDs at Pitt and Carnegie Mellon.
You can have many other questions but that’s what their results found.
See response above that highlights how highly educated are highly vaccinated.
The most highly vaccinated group. So sure, there is a small percentage of far edge
Phds out there that haven’t budged. So that article needs to be seen in bigger context, right ?
I agree. There’s definitely a correlation between education level and lack of vaccine hesitancy.
What really annoys me is when I meet a person with, at least in a credentialed sense, a high level of education, and that person is STILL an anti-Vaxxer.
I expect better from educated people.
Kyle’s study is misleading because it doesn’t address which group is the most hesitant overall (less educated) and which is the least (well-educated). Only which groups showed the least/greatest changes in hesitancy over time.