You’re such a pussy! Keep posting articles no one cares about, puss!
You claim to be married. You claim to have kids. So you should care. Unless, you look that is totally normal for you libs to push that crap.
The internal memo referenced in that headline does not say “only extremists are concerned with sexualization of children”. Do you actually read beyond any headlines? There is even a picture of the actual memo you can read. Typical low info post from you.
pepperdork, you’re the p-word!
I’ve tapped more tail than an inquisitive midget!
I don’t lie! I’m married to a beautiful Jewish princess!
You’re married to your spaff rag!
I’m smarter, funnier, and prettier than you. You are a troll, but I will defeat you any day of the week, until the moderators ban me for besting you.
“Recent extremist focuses are: ’sexualization’ of children, gender issues, and drag performances,” the memo continues. “Guests may express their opposition to Target’s support of the LGBTQIA+ community in general or to specific Pride merchandise through disruptive incidents in our stores or by making threats of violence.”
They are calling people that don’t want libs to sexualize kids “extremist”. A normal person would think that would be the view of every human being.
I’m not calling for you to be banned sweet pea! Haven’t asked anybody to be banned. I’m not pollard or whatever his name is.
So you agree the memo did not say only extremists are interested in this.
That’s not what they said. They said that extremists have been focusing on anything considered sexualization of children, etc. That is a factual statement.
There are plenty of people who are not extremists that have those concerns. It is the extremists that could cause harm, not just a regular person outraged by those things. This memo is about safety and security, so yes it focuses on the extremists who actually pose a potential violent threat. It is not demonizing anyone who disagrees with Target’s stance and wants to boycott or protest.
Did you graduate from UH? Your reading comprehension seems to be lacking.