What was the call that gave TCU the ball with 24 seconds left. We got the ball at 33 seconds. I didn’t see anything we did other than getting past mid court. Just curious
Violated 10 second rule
10 second violation.
Uzan inbounded to Flemmings and TCU put 3 or 4 defenders around him. He finally got it back to someone (Uzan I believe) but he didn’t go forward fast enough.
What made it a little confusing was we inbounded to Flemings who held it for a few seconds then called timeout. For the next inbounds, the 10 second clock does not reset, so it only took 6 or 7 seconds to violate the rule.
5 Likes
I kept saying we should have Flemmings inbounding to Uzan during the final minute. They wouldn’t foul Flemmings, but would foul Uzan. Both are good from the FT line.
Okay… that’s why it seemed short to me…
Pretty sure that I read we are shooting 80.3% from the FT line this season…!
1 Like
Didn’t they review that 10 second call? I watched it on replay. The shot clock read ‘28’ on the TV. Now I know that could be anything from 28.0 to 28.9. When we caught the ball across the line the TV shot clock read ‘19’. We got screwed.
Also, the new coaches review rule hurts us cause we’re so bad at it
After the bucket, UH inbounded and then called timeout. There was 28 on the shot clock. The 10-second clock remains active from when it was originally put into play; it does not reset.
3 Likes
Ah, that explains it. So ‘19’ left proves the call correct
There were a lot of awful calls and the officials just killed the rhythm of the game with not only bad ones but unnecessary like minimal contact on a rebound when the fouled team had the rebound anyway. However, coach was mad at our players for the 10 sec violation and probably given the instruction during the previous TO.