OT: More Proof UH Is Transforming to Traditional Campus

Sharing the stadium is not a good idea imo.

8 Likes

Why?
UH paid for the stadium. TSU did not. If TSU wants to use our stadium they should pay for it.

12 Likes

they’ve wanted to on several occasions -

cant whine about revenue in one thread but when you have an opportunity to gain more you play hardball - more events in the stadium means more possibilities for things

1 Like

I am all for them to play at TDECU and pay for it. More events means more money to us.

4 Likes

St Thomas has gotten aggressive in enrollment and the Hispanic culture (heavy Catholicism) fits the role - all I’m saying is the ones going to UH are they going to participate in daily activities or just be a commuter - that’s going to define the future

Do you know why HBCU’s exist?

I doubt that Texas Southern would actively welcome gentrification, in fact, they probably would fight to stop gentrification especially given where the university is located.

1 Like

If UH chooses, the Board of Regents can use Immenient Domain and buy land at market price for educational development. One of our Legal Beagles should speak to this issue .
Go Coogs !

1 Like

TSU isn’t located truly in the bottoms of 3rd ward - it’s part riverside terrace - part cuney homes - some folks want to buy more land to put baseball/softball fields on campus and welcome doing so - you wont get any push back - theyve secured plots on Alabama Street already

3 Likes

“Eminent domain”

Thank you .

Does the idea still go for the church that damaged the stadium?

I agree the Cuney Homes redevelopment will be pivotal. The outcome will be interesting to say the least.

@Aquin :sweat_smile: Yes the church shall have access to the stadium as a revenue stream also with keener oversight. :joy:

The Nook shutting down is a pretty strong signal that UH may not be transforming in the way this thread proposes.

1 Like

Not shutting down. Just moving to the RAD.

They hope.

But in any case, there’s a world of difference between a coffee counter in a food court and an actual proper coffee shop. The fact that UH can’t keep the latter of those two open without a subsidy (shout out Cougar Grounds) should be discouraging.

1 Like

Exactly, go ahead and mention it to the local politicians. By their “leadership” they are purposely slowing down the Third Ward gentrification.

1 Like

I don’t have an idea or solution but whenever I visit the establishments near the Nook, the Pizza parlor, as well as the The Den. The deterrent for me is the parking. I know there is free parking close to establishments but if you park anywhere else it’s at a cost. I know students pay for parking and visitors as well but if I can’t find a free parking spot I may choose to go elsewhere. No solution but my thoughts.

2 Likes

That’s kind of the thing, though — looking near “traditional” universities (Auburn, Texas, Georgia Tech, Penn State) coffee shops, restaurants, bars, etc often have little or no parking because the population that they serve is already on or near campus. If you’re going to a bar before/after a game or a coffee shop after class, you already have parking elsewhere if you need it. Parking is sort of a waste of real estate that’s pretty expensive relative to the profit margins for a university-oriented business.

1 Like

The reputation of the Nook has not been great on campus since 2022.

1 Like

UT-Austin and UH are literally the same campus. Both campuses have very similar on-campus vs. off-campus populations. The only difference is that UT-Austin’s student population isn’t majority from Austin, while UH’s student population IS majority from Houston. Therefore, the likelihood that non-Austin residents rent off-campus housing closer to campus is much higher than someone who lives in Katy or Sugarland and commutes to UH campus (because they don’t think it’s worth paying rent when you live 45 minutes away).

If UT-Austin primarily served Austin high school graduates, then they would be dealing with the same commuter issues that we do.

With that said, many of the users here that are “all for gentrification” fail to understand that the majority of inner-loop kids are not going to UH in droves. Many don’t even go to A&M.

So once Third Ward inevitably transforms into Rice Village, it’s not going to be UH central. It’s going to be St Thomas/Episcopal-tier kids going to UT/SMU/TCU or out-of-state.

Gentrifying Third Ward isn’t going to suddenly transform UH into a “traditional university”. In fact, it’s probably going to make rent off-campus even more expensive. It will make the campus surroundings more pretty to look at, and maybe that will attract kids who would otherwise go to UT, → but it’s not going to change the fabric of UH’s current demographics.

That’s going to take decades (assuming the college route remains the same over the next 20-50 years)

1 Like