Are you saying Fritz would leave us for a school with more money?
At his age, maybe not.
Or at least, I hope not.
But a younger coach likely would.
See Sumlin and Herman for reference.
Another law flawed answer. The primary reasons that both left were because of:
- Coaching in a power conference
- Two in state rivals that wanted to stick it to us
Houston represents a unique HC job due to the recruiting area. HCWF surely has an open line to Fertitta. At his age and his connections to Houston I do not see him make a move.
Well, thereās more than just that.
A younger coach with a better money offer from a P2 school, and not necessarily just an in state rival, probably would jumpā¦ESPECIALLY if theyād also be going to a school with more money to pay the top recruits.
So no, itās hardly a flawed answer. On the contrary, itās a CORRECT answer.
A young coach might very well leave for a P2 offer, and especially for a P2 blue blood with a bigger NIL/roster budget and a better salary.
But an older coach looking to make this his last stop is more likely to stay even if offered more money.
It is what it is.
Thatās probably true but even still we should acknowledge that the B12 helped us land Fritz. He was a 2 time AAC COY. Thatās the profile of a coach that would usually use UH as the stepping stone to get to another job. Former award winners went on to coach at Texas, Wisconsin, FSU, Nebraska, Okst⦠and UH. The P4 tag put us a step up in the pecking order. Thatās significant.
It is. No dispute.
But a young successful coach here would still likely bolt if a P2 job with more NIL and a higher salary became available.
I think thereās still some SEC/B10 schools that wouldnāt lure a coach away (Vandy, Miss St, Purdue, etc) but yah thereās probably 30ish schools that could potentially poach our coach, but thatās a lot better than 60+ previously. And even then you probably wonāt have to worry too much about openings at B10 schools if youāre hiring coaches with strong southern ties. Weāre also able to poach top end G6 coaches as opposed to having to rely on coordinators which is a nice boost to our potential coaching pool. Weāre in a much better position than we were in the American.
No one disputes that.
But we could still have a young Coach poached by a program with more money, which was really the gist of this.