Iâm almost 
% totally convinced there might be something to that.
Well, Iâm more of an independent correct thinker than a Republican. I definitely know what CRT and for that matter, what its parent, Critical Legal Studies (CLS) are, simply because in law schools, the âCrits,â as they are called, are sort of a thing.
That said, I wouldnât say that Iâm âafraidâ of anything like that.
Canât say I really agree with their thinking in every case, but even when I disagree, Iâm hardly âafraid.â
I will say this though. Itâs pretty silly to worry about that at the K-12 level, simply because Iâve really never seen that stuff taught anywhere except at law schools.
Even then, itâs just one school of thought that might be taught alongside many others.
Well, that ends this topic. The âcorrect thinkerâ has weighed in.
CRT scholars have critiqued many of the assumptions that they believe constitute the ideology of the First Amendment. For example, instead of helping to achieve healthy and robust debate, the First Amendment actually serves to preserve the inequities of the status quo; there can be no such thing as an objective or content neutral interpretation in law in general or of the First Amendment in particular; some speech should be viewed in terms of the harm it causes, rather than all speech being valued on the basis of it being speech; and there is no âequalityâ in âfreedomâ of speech.
Its against the first ammendment!
Thatâs obviously debatable. Where did you get that from?
An article from a leftwing rag
Which works with my âcircularâ view on US political groupsâŠthe far left and far right go so far and sink so low they meet at the bottom.
Use quotes when itâs not your authorship.
Youâre incapable of reasoned, elevated discourse or written articulacy.
Typical DA response from the peanut gallery
There is also something called the horseshoe principleâŠlike on a horseshoe, the more extreme the views, they actually start to drift closer and harder to see any difference.
I thought it was a toilet seat.
Thanks for proving my point, but next time include your ârainbowâ commentary. Or are you supressing that as well?
I thought it was your empty head with a toilet seat
Arenât citations SUPPOSED to be used to support oneâs thesis? That was a thing when I was an undergraduate in English. And more of the same - MUCH more - during my graduate studies.
The above wasnât cited. I think that was his point.
Wow. You are a stupid 2nd grader.