We’re shutting it down tomorrow
West Virginia just left it in the hands of an NCAA selection committee that will be hard-pressed by SEC biased media to shoehorn 14 SEC teams into the tournament.
That is my concern, prob looking at play in game now
Fr tho
Common Gray, you know better than that….even with the loss they have a shot at being in….depends on how many bid stealers.
I would love to see more mid majors that have won 25 games than Power 4 schools with 12-14 losses.
That’s just me

you’d think people would know better since we are in like year 7 of having the net and 4 quadrants but some people still think the longhorns and tar heels aren’t in autobid or bust mode yet ![]()
It’s not just you. I would love to see more of the mid majors in the tournament, too. I wish they would put in a rule that you have to be at least 500 in your conference to qualify for an NCAA tournament bid, unless you win your conference tournament.
That would make the conference tournaments a lot more interesting, too.
No we will get a good lead then rest the starters, and get ready for Fridays game
We know that would never happen….dont know that you could use .500 as the line but I get it.
I don’t think UNC or UT deserve to get in over MANY smaller schools….we’ll see.
My post went over your head. We’re shutting down their sideshow tomorrow.
the standards for power conference teams getting was already in the gutter (see 21-22 rutgers) and that was before realignment consolidated all the Q1 games even more
as for UNC and UT, it would be surprising if they got at-larges to me even considering brand bias because UNC will have a resume that’s nearly a carbon copy of what they had 2 years ago when they infamously missed the tourney after being the preseason number one and the longhorns didn’t even try to load up their noncon, let alone get good wins from it compared to UGA, OU or even Ohio State
West Virginia is in
Which thread should we follow on the same topic? This one or the thread that is already discussing big 12 basketball? ![]()