Now let me ask everyone here.
In the 10 years since this new logo was introduced, have we seen a lasting impact of people buying more Houston Cougars merchandise?
Also, has everyone embraced the logos nicely or are there still some nostalgia for the old school UH logo?
I like the latest logo. Iām good with it.
The fat UH is garbage. Always has been, always will be. If the old logo was still in use, it would see the same sales as the new. The logo doesnāt drive the sale. The āuniversityā logo is far better than the fat UH used for athletics.
Iām not sure what the politics were beyond the athletics dept wanting a logo and branding they could control, but Iām glad the university retained a brand with the more classic look to it.
I personally like the new logo. I think because of the new logo Iām more likely to wear it since it looks more modern. There are some throwback t shirts with the old logo i would like but on polos i donāt think Iād like it as much.
I like a combination. Definitively donāt like fat
They donāt use the fat logo anymore
The fat with the wet coog, yuck.
It had itās time and place - I still have several items with it on them. But, for me, it reminds me of the C-USA days. While there were some highlights to those days, I prefer to leave those days and that logo in the past.
I prefer the old school logo (the one the university still uses). Personally, I like uniqueness, something that says āthis is ours.ā The current logo is just like Kentuckyās, whereas the old school logo stands alone.
We made ours before Kentucky. Atleast i think so.
Youāre correct, but thatās what tends to happen when you get away from what sets you apart. Iād just rather UH have a logo recognizable as itās historical standard. Much like, dare I say, UT, TAMU, TT, etc.
Out interlocking logo has stayed mostly the same over time other than adjusting width and bevels. Thatās not that different than what other schools have done (Tech, OU, aggie, etc.).
Current logo set is my favorite that weāve had since Iāve been there. I went from 06-10 so I do like the fat logo, but never really liked wet coog logo.
I donāt think itās the best logo weāve ever had, but it does beat its immediate predecessor. Personally, I felt like the (post-update) beveled version felt more āUHā, but I dont really have any complaints.
Mmm yeeeaahh, true. But, the devil is in the detailsā¦ie. the way the letters interlock, the font, the length, etc. MANY schools have made slight tweeks to their designs throughout the years, however most logos still remain pretty distinguishable from everyone elseās (TT, TAMU, UT, Michigan, UCLA, USC, and so on). College is all about traditionā¦you either have one, or youāre trying to create one. This is derived from consistency in identity. Personally, I just prefer the identity of the old school design which was uniquely UHās.
I dont know no Fat UH but PHAT UH was hot! Haha choke on a phat one! 
Ā© 1999-2025 CoogFans.com
