Those are nice. What website are you using?
1 Like
Heres a good website i use for Q1, Q2 breakdown
5 Likes
2 Likes
Why are you comparing OSU to UCF?
Again, I’m comparing ATM with OSU. Both are 13-3 but the one who lost to the other is rated ahead of the winner. And it was a 24 point loss.
Does the baffling overturn of the basket at Auburn giving ATM one quad one win override a 24 point loss head to head? Or maybe Aggy is rated higher for going 0-3 out of conference to NET top 100 teams by a combined 49 points whereas OSU went 4-1? Or maybe it’s the 8 wins over teams rated 200-365 by the Ags?
If the math is math, by selection Sunday we should know who is in. Why is it the “metrics” seem to always favor the SEC and B10.
To put it succintly, yes. It’s been well established that a Q1 loss does not hurt you overall that much. Also keep in mind that Ok State’s win over the Aggies is only a Q2 win. Which is why I’m bringing up that our teams need to be smart about scheduling. They gave an SEC team a Q1 opportunity essentially for free and only got a Q2 win in return. That’s terrible scheduling from a conference standpoint. Hence why I brought up UCF which also played A&M in College Station giving themselves a Q1 opportunity and win. Q1 opportunities (even in a loss) help boost your rating. Ok State scheduled themselves ZERO Q1 games in the non-con. That’s unacceptable especially when they can largely control it. If they had 1 Q1 win on their resume then they’d be easy 10 spots higher. I’m not going to cry foul for some SEC rigged metrics conspiracy for a conference mate that’s willingly shot themselves in the foot.
2 Likes
Because their commissioner brought all the basketball coaches together and told them how to schedule in the non-conference to boost their metrics. They’re playing chess while some of our coaches/teams are playing checkers. This is not something that is beyond the capacity of the B12 to swing into our favor. We just need our mid-bottom end teams to do the advantageous scheduling (which includes giving up home games and going on the road) and then actually perform better.
1 Like
UCFs is better but i wouldn’t hold my breath on them getting the benefit of the doubt unless A&M can jump into the top 40 if they sit at the bubble
also at oklahoma state getting blitzed by a struggling baylor at home 
1 Like
1/15 Coog Rankings
NET 12
T-Rank 4
KenPom 7
BPI 5
KPI 11
SOR 9
WAB 10
Ratings not included in the TeamSheet
EvanMiya 4
Haslemetrics 9
2 Likes
Each year is a little different, but that does point out how hard it is to move up into the top 4.
Tech’s move from 19 to 7 was probably the most significant jump in the top 20.
2 Likes
Torvik rankings from 11/3 - 1/16
We’ll be in good shape if we can get the offense to keep slowly improving into March. Past champs almost always are top 15 in both offense & defensive efficiency
4 Likes
No big deal. 8 BIG 10 teams will lose on the first weekend, just like always.
6 Likes
texas tech in the elite 8 in houston would be interesting…
I’d take that bracket in a heart beat
6 Likes
Yep if being a 3 put us in that bracket, take it
5 Likes
end of season we’re gonna play our way to at least the 2 line but its a sign we are jumping some teams
11 SEC teams. lol.
5 Likes
LOL at Nebraska…