1 Like
“You have to read between the lines what he’s saying” That’s true with all communists.
Is he looking for a handup or a handout? Why not enter into talks with Putin? Who are those 51 prisoners being released, probably innocent people to begin with?
Lets try unconditional surrender
1 Like
Let’s see how could this happen…NOW?
Make Rubio the new president. Time to move on
this before the fall of Iran or the season of Fall.
This should be an easy win.
No paywall article talking about what the Cuban people are doing to survive.
https://tinyurl.com/53y7kekb
What’s the point of the article?
Let’s see.
We have a set of so called nytimes journalists interviewing the Cuban dictatorship. Hum, I wonder how they were able to pull off this interview…
This is the nytimes telling its readers to believe the Cuban dictatorship.
This is the same Cuban dictatorship that has killed hundred of thousands of its own citizens and continues to do so…
Is the nytimes trying to find out the latest number Cubans killed in the last 20 years?
This is the same Cuban dictatorship that has imprisoned a countless number of opponents.
Is the nytimes trying to find out how many are in jail?
Was the nytimes trying to interview parents of these same human beings that are rotting in jail?
Through this so called article again these so called nytimes reporters offer the same credibility of North Korean reporters interviewing their supreme leader. Did they weep when they started talking to the current Cuban dictator?
No they did not speak to him but one of its lackey.
The nytimes since pretty much its start has had a close relationship with the communist movement. This dates back to its creation with again so called reporters admiring the soviet regime.
The article is so perverted that the nytimes entire message is that the U.S. is responsible for the Cuban economy’s demise.
nytimes Message:
The U.S., DJT is a terrible human being/leader but no matter what the commies will prevail.
At no point does this article offer why the Cuban communist economy has never worked. Instead it/nytimes blames the U.S.
Another piece of garbage that is too stinky to be recycled.
Thank you for posting.
1 Like
That’s not really what the article says or discusses.
I find it interesting to hear how things are going over there. Cuba has been out of the news for a bit.
Tell that to the parents of the ones that are in jail or have been killed.
The nytimes is famous for its pro communist propaganda articles. They are great at it.
2 Likes
Yup
2 Likes
Regardless of issues with Cuban government (and there are many), an update on what’s going on in the country is helpful context. I haven’t seen anything else discussing it.
And a lot of the article was about the Cuban people vs government.
1 Like
Yup
Whatever. When everyone can see a pro communist Cuba times piece it is worth to point out.
1 Like
The New York Times secured its first journalism visa for Cuba in nearly eight years by spending six months meeting with diplomats and convincing them of fair reporting, subsequently interviewing Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Fernández de CossĂo while also speaking broadly with ordinary citizens about economic and political frustrations.Securing AccessThe New York Times noted that reporter Jack Nicas met with top Cuban diplomats across multiple cities over a six-month period to lobby for reporting access.Journalists reported that once they arrived in Havana, they moved around freely, selected their own interview subjects, and were not closely monitored by state minders.
The coverage also included speaking directly with dozens of local residents, artists, and business owners about daily struggles, power outages, and divergent views on the causes of the island’s crisis
I find it interesting. Others can disagree for whatever reasons.
I don’t think you can claim to care about the people if you don’t want to hear what they have to say
1 Like
The point of the article was about the resilience of the Cuban people and how they are surviving in their current economic climate (or collapse). I would think if you read the article, you’d have seen that. I found that very interesting and shared it thinking others would find it interesting as well.
I don’t recall anything in the article to be particulary pro-communist, or pro-Cuban government. However, I recognize they most likely needed government permission to be there and it should be read with that understanding. The article didn’t paint a picture that everything was hunky dory though.
Can you point out the statements in the article that support your premise ?
If not, people will see this as just another rant, with no supporting evidence.
Or maybe @RobDob will help you out on this one, since he supported your premise.
2 Likes