Epstein Files (No politics or DOJ website links)

The Satellite
1212

I am glad the Clinton’s are getting scrutinized and testifying about their knowledge of Epstein.

But this also sets a precedence DJT can’t shake so easily.

There are plenty of prominent Republicans like Lutnick who are in the file, if the Clinton’s are made to testify so should any prominent Republican too. One supports full transparency regardless of party. If not your just playing parisan politics.

Hillary was never accused of doing anything witj the victims and her association was via her husband.

Does that open the door for Melania to be asked to testify since her husband was the most names person in the files and you can’t dispute she knew Epstein?

Lastly, they have made Bill Clinton testify shouldn’t that apply to DJT too? Do subpoenas not mean anything? He has ignored them before.

Why is there a double standard?

Again, i am glad the Clintons are testifying and I think it will just bring more scrutiny and a demand for answers from DJT, as there should be.

1 Like
1213

Aren’t there actual photos of her with Epstein and/or Maxwell?

2 Likes
1214

And you shouldn’t reading pedo defenders is a leading cause of eye cancer.

1215

Absolutely. Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Martian, they all should testify in front of the Republican lead Bipartisan committee.

Yep, it’s a Dem plot to get DJT. That’s why the Republican lead committee used subpoena power on the Clinton’s because that’s exactly how they can get DJT. :joy:

3 Likes
1216

People that want to blame the attention of the Epstein files as being some Democrat push are just denying reality. The fact is the Epstein law was a bipartisan law.

The fact is plenty of pundits, personalities, podcasters, politicians, etc. on the right have been pushing for this transparency, arrests and the like for a long time. Some of these people (Patel) have important positions in the current administration to do something about it or recently were in those positions (Boningo). Many of them, like MTJ and others are still pushing for the transparency and action. It is safe to say none of those people wanted to “get DJT”.

I would accept an argument that there was more interest on the right than the left previously. Though DJT did campaign on this transparency and make a promise towards it. He even made some token silly photo op giving right wing influencers binders full of materials that were already public. He, and many people were happy when they could do that and call it a win.

Epstein is a speeding locomotive that is going to plow through anyone on the tracks. Now that it has turned into a runaway train for DJT, he and others are trying to continually reframe this as some Democrat hatched plot which is ridiculous.

As if Dems were somehow so devious as to convince all the people on the right that Epstein was a big deal, get them to push for transparency, get DJT to make a campaign promise about it, and now swoop in for the kill by… doing what exactly? Deposing the Clinton’s and Les Wexner? Issuing subpoenas to former U.S. Attorneys General Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Jeff Sessions, Alberto Gonzales, William Barr, and Merrick Garland. Also James Comey, and Robert Mueller (I think his was recinded). Then of course Maxwell was also subject to subpoena.

There’s no one at the controls of the train now. This is a speeding locomotive at this point, it’s going to plow through anyone standing on the tracks.

I want everyone involved to be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. I don’t care who they are, what political party, country of origin, royal title, political office, or amount of money they have.

I just don’t see that accountability coming in the U.S. I wish I could be more optimistic on that.

3 Likes
1217

Question:
Did the dems party invite p.o.s. epstein so they could raise money for the same dems party while fully knowing he was a convicted child molestor and rapist?

Where is your uproar against the same dems party?
What about Jefferies? Should he resign?

1218

I’ve seen no one take up for any of that. In fact, I’ve seen nearly everyone say go after them all. Also, you are ignoring the post you’re replying to if you read it at all.

Please stop making this entirely political. If that’s all you’re going to do, move on from the convo. It’s not that way for most of us.

1 Like
1219

You and others have made it political. The entire thread is about DJT and how to get him. This has been the intent from the very beginning.
All of the p.o.s.’ that have committed these crimes ought to be locked up for the rest of their lives.

1 Like
1220

No, it’s not. And I’ve shown that to you previously. I’ve also personally gone after a pretty political spectrum of people by name in it. There is no basis in what you’re saying.

This isn’t a dem vs rep convo. Please stop going there.

7 Likes
1223

I don’t know how I can be more clear.

1 Like
1224

We all have, he is just suffereing from his own hero worship and he only sees what he wants to believe, that they are out to get him.

4 Likes
1225

Nobody here is defending dems

You keep bringing up partisan opinions because you think everything is an attack on your team

All should take accountability regardless of party

8 Likes
1229

So what is it?

Was it mar-a-lago, or was it the real estate deal?

https://x.com/epsteinsearchin/status/2028686854850322694

1231

It depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is.

1232

DJT has said that in public. He’s also said the other.

Who knows what’s true.

1 Like
1233

That’s what T told Clinton? If I was T I’d probably say that too about people I had a falling out with. No one would ask follow up questions, they can all understand a bad real estate deal and it wouldn’t be potentionally defamatory.

1234

But this real estate deal caused a falling out?

Why?

Shouldn’t T be willing to answer?

1235

If T said that to Clinton at golf, most likely Clinton wouldn’t ask why - it wasn’t Clinton’s business to know. This is something to ask in hindsight of course.

Answer who? Clinton. No. Answer under a subpoena… sure. First one would have to be issued. However, his answer could be “I do not recall the specifics of the deal, afterall I do tons of deals and that was a long time ago”.

Much like you got with Less Wexner’s deposition.

1236

Lots of various reports on this, but both “could” be true. Here’s a timeline.

Judge for yourselves.

1237

@Duce630

T and Jeffrey Epstein were BEST FRIENDS for 15 years. You don’t simply lose a friendship of that length, that caliber, over a mere real estate deal unless it was something dire.

After Epstein, T has never had a real best friend. Every relationship he has is transactional.

That said, there’s no way that T doesn’t remember the details of their falling out.

I think there is more to that real estate deal that he doesn’t want out:

  1. DT outbid Epstein in the midst of deep financial problems (the T Organization declared bankruptcy the same year of the purchase)
  2. He sold the mansion to Dmitry Rybolovlev, a known Russian money launderer, who never even lived in the mansion, for double the price in 2008. Literally just 2 months before the financial housing crisis where global real estate collapsed
  3. According to Michael Wolff, this wast necessarily a bidding war, but rather, T went behind Epstein’s back to purchase this mansion after Epstein sought T’s advice for the pool
  4. There is on-record evidence shortly hereafter that T had either reported and/or assisted with Epstein’s trafficking investigations directly with the Palm Beach PD

This wasn’t a falling out. There was something deeper to this, and T does not and has not publicly spoke about it. @rtcoog