Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
I’m convening an emergency meeting of the Coogfans message board attorneys for this. Be on time, freaks!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
I’m convening an emergency meeting of the Coogfans message board attorneys for this. Be on time, freaks!
And we are back to explaining what 1st amendment protections actually mean.
So what really does this accomplish? I’m not surprised they don’t want to fight this in court.
They are a non-profit organization they did not have the money to go up against Elon and Peter Theil money.
I’m wondering that myself. Its not like they shut down and immediately the advertisers return to X. In fact this article notes that the lawsuit is only driving some media buyers further away from X.
Still interesting case to follow but certainly this development could be a win for X, although it might be a hollow victory.
This story has more chapters before it reaches an ending
Absolutely. More to come.
Yeah, makes sense as an advertiser. Why in the heck would anyone want to advertise on a platform that will sue you if you decide to stop advertising with them ? X ad revenue will probably
take even a bigger hit. Another brilliant Musk move.
It isn’t that one company didn’t advertise. Collusion of companies to ruin the business is the issue.
RICO isn’t out of the question especially with the closing of GARM.
Elon fan boys, please explain how its a violation of 1st amendment?
RICO ?
Really seems like a stretch to go there.
What next, sue Good HouseKeeping Seal because your product does not earn their recommendation ?
CRIMES THAT ARE COVERED BY THE RICO ACT
A violation of RICO occurs when a person, in connection with an enterprise, engages in a pattern of racketeering activity. Racketeering activity includes:
- Arson
- Bribery
- Counterfeiting
- Distribution of a controlled substance
- Embezzlement
- Extortion
- Gambling
- Homicide
- Kidnapping
- Mail fraud
- Money laundering
- Robbery
- Wire fraud
- Witness tampering
Perhaps anti-trust is more appropriate although extortion isn’t far off
If I was trying to make a case for it, yeah, I’d guess I’d try to twist it into an extortion case.
But I’d have to be drunk or high to do it.
Now let me ask you about the MPA - Motion Picture Academy that assigns content
ratings to our films. Could the Bang Bros Film Studio, or other studios, sue the MPA for always getting the NC-17 ratings for its artistic films ?
That seems more like what Elon is fighting with the attack on GARM.
What Is Extortion? Punishment, Types And Meaning – Forbes Advisor.
Extortion is obtaining any items of value, such as money or property, through threats or force.
In this case, it sounds more like Elon is attempting to extort the advertisers with his lawsuit.
Yes, thats the law the X suit alleging was violated.
There is ample evidence out there about what is now on X. Seems like Elon is desperate.
But with his wealth he can continue the frivolous lawsuits.
The MediaMatters lawsuit is schedule for April 2025
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/13/tech/elon-musk-x-lawsuit-media-matters/index.html
RICO because they didn’t give Tesla money.
That’s not the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard but it’s up there.
Maybe for his next attempt to grab attention, he’ll sue people for not buying Teslas en masse.
Buy a Ford, get an Elon lawsuit for free !
I mean that’s kind of the whole thing, if this suit is allowed to stand the precedent is set that any organized boycott could be subject to litigation. It’s a whole new avenue for SLAAP suits. I mean good for rich chuckleheads not so great for anyone else.
How long until Elon runs for president? You know, since rules don’t matter anymore?
©Copyright 2017 Coogfans.com