Given pallets of $Billions were never justified. October 7th is one of the example of it.
I donât necessarily disagree with you, I do not think that there should have been a cash release as it was done. If they were to release frozen funds, it should have been done in a way that we could control how it was being spent.
If DJT is going to release frozen funds as part of a deal now, it also should have controls on how it can be spent.
Why were their assets frozen in the first place?
- The Iranian Hostage situation
What caused the Iranian Hostage situation?
- The United States overthrew their government for trying to completely nationalize their oil industry, and Iran took it back
What gives the US the right to determine how Iran spends their frozen assets? Itâs their assets.
What gave the Iranianâs the right to take Americans hostage?
What gives us the right to overthrow anotherâs countryâs government?
We can both play the ethics game all day - Iâm merely stating the facts.
Ask Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, or Imperial Japan the same questions.
Weâve been overthrowing governments all the way back to the early 1800s.
See here:
Ever heard the USMC song âFrom the Halls of Montezuma, to the shores of Tripoli.â
The ending refers to the first ever foreign âregime changeâ attempt in US history.
Nazi Germany and Imperialist Japan is equal to Iran wanting to have a state-owned oil industry?
Donât forget. We were once allies with Iran.
â Until they wanted to nationalize their oil industry.
Again, Iâve met Iranian-Americans who describe the Mossadegh overthrow as a âpopular uprisingâ with the CIA role as minimal.
Just sayinâ!
Anyway, US led regime change overseas has a history going all the way back to 1805.
What makes you think he would do that?
There wonât be a deal without this dictatorship giving up their nuclear âpowderâ and renouncing on their nuclear ambition and ballistic missile programs.
Donât use the Irak and Afghan war. That is the worst example you can bring up.
If we can supply Iranians withvarms that will be the best way tobhelp them to overthrow this dictatorship. Let them get these p.o.sâs.
To be clear, I was meaning to communicate what I would do, not what I expect to actually happen, and certainly not what this admin will do.
Again, Iâve met Iranian-Americans who describe the Mossadegh overthrow as a âpopular uprisingâ with the CIA role as minimal.
Just sayinâ!
Couple of anecdotes vs piles of documented evidence. I know which one Iâm taking every day of the week. And it ainât vibes
Iâm sure this is going to play well during election season: $300 billion, plus the dollar amount that we spent in military actions, and 13 American lives.
No one doubts that the CIA was involved.
BUTâŠOTOHâŠthey wouldnât have had any success were it not for the fact that there were LOTS of Iranians happy to help overthrow him.
Had he been more popular, he might not have had enough opposition to topple him.
Just sayinâ!
From the articleâŠ
The two sources put the fund at $300 billion, though other officials involved in mediation would not confirm the amount, according to the report.
Two diplomats briefed on the latest draft called it âan international âinvestment fund,â which the United States would help facilitate in the event of a final deal,â
So another slush fund for our paragon of ethics and good behavior
- why do you keep saying âIrak?â
Itâs IRAQ with a Q on the end. In Arabic and Persian script, the last letter of that countryâs name is written with the letter âqaaf,â which is a hard âQâ sound like in âQuebec.â NOT the letter âkaafâ which is a K sound. GET IT RIGHT!!! Trust me on this as a guy that spent nine months in language school learning that script.
I believe youâve been corrected on this before. Itâs sorta like your use of UTA to refer to UT-Austin; thatâs the abbrevation for UT-ARLINGTON. Why do you keep making these same mistakes? If you mean UT-Austin, write âUT,â NOT âUTAâ which refers to something else.
-
I didnât even bring up Iraq and Afghanistan, so Iâm not sure why you did. But yes, in the case of Afghanistan, the Taliban needed to be overthrown for harboring OBL after 9/11. Too bad we couldnât keep them out of power and ultimately lost the war. As for Iraq, debatable, but given that Iraq today is the most functioning democracy in the Arab world, I have a hard time second guessing the move.
-
Weâve been changing regimes abroad since 1805. See the Tripoli example that I provided. Often we have been quite successful with it.
-
We will fight to overthrow any regime when it is in our national interests to do so.
-
As for HOW we overthrow them, there are many different instruments of national power (diplomatic, informational, military, economic). Which techniques are appropriate should be evaluated on a case by case basis. No two cases are alike.
What makes you think he would do that?
I said âif he does itâ. I didnât say I think he would, I also didnât say I think he wonât.
However, it is a possibility that something like that would be part of any deal. Currently thereâs reports of a potential $300B investment fund for rebuilding being on the table. Though until an actual deal is on paper & signed, we donât know for sure what will be in it. That is assuming we have some sort of âpermanentâ deal at all and not just a MOU working towards further negotiations.
As youâve stated, none of us know for sure what will or wonât be in the deal or on the table. So none of us can truly rule anything out.
Frizen assests of a dictatorship means exactly what it is
None of these assets belong to them. NONE.
Says who?
Its just like WW2, its just like 1805
Again, regime change is as American as apple pie.
LONG history.