National Signing day

NIL gets good players but you still need a decent coach.

1 Like

yep
LAW doesn’t get it.

WE were literally 2-3 NIL offensive player acquisitions away from playing in the Conference Championship Game this weekend.

And many of those holes COULD HAVE been fixed had we hired a coach + star players package deal.

THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX with how we wisely use our funds!

The Big 12 was winnable and so was a playoff spot!

We don;t have to be the # 1 NIL squad int he country we need to use our corporate NIL pot to keep the nucleus + augment the roster with select NIL acquisitions.

And I know you poo poo the basketball class
but that is a HUGE deal. Those other schools are still throwing huge NIL $$$ at those recruits and we ARE BEATING THEM!

While I agree with most of what you said. Not producing championship seasons hasn’t deterred aggy donors to not keep pumping $ into their program.

Uhhhhh
come on now.

It takes more than that amount of players to field a top 15 football team.

Ed Oliver’s teams didn’t finish in the Top 15.

Where is NIL powerhouse Oregon finishing, by contrast?

So based on that
I’d say that YOU don’t get it.

1-3 blue chippers can produce a Top 15 basketball team.

It takes more than that in football.

We don’t have that kind of NIL dough
that does not appear to be changing
and it’s NOT happening before our very eyes.

Those are all INCORRECT assertions on your part.

we only had to win the Big 12.
NEITHER Iowa State or Arizona State are top 15 so you are even WRONG on that one

image

Sure about that?

1 Like

We’ll see if either finishes in the Top Ten.

Is any school that isn’t a big NIL school currently in it?

They don’t need a huge NIL collective because they have Phil Knight.

He’ll buy them whatever they need.

Same with SMU’s oil barrons.

1 Like

do you know how rich and powerful UH alums are?

We have CEOs all over the place
high powered lawyers
even the last two Mayors of Houston were Coogs!

I think both of you have valid and invalid opinions

1 Like

Those alums are all old no offense

1 Like

And again
how many of them care enough about UH sports to where they will fund the NIL honeypot sufficiently?

Hint: so far
HARDLY ANY.

Remember it takes TWO things:

a) rich alums and donors, that

b) care enough about sports to fund the NIL honeypot sufficiently.

Even if UH has a, which is debatable, it’s pretty obvious that we don’t have b.

Stanford has a, but NOT b.

And in football
that’s BIG. It’s big in basketball too, but again, in basketball, you only need 1-3 players per year.

2 Likes

Tilman is the chair of the board. How much money is he worth?

Billions.

He’ll need to pay for players to come to UH the way that UT and SMU’s rich benefactors do in order for us to remain at an elite football level.

I don’t see it happening thus far.

We’re literally about to sink close to $10m into a basketball roster next year. To think we can’t do that for football is silly.

6 Likes

yes
old have A LOT of money to donate

8 Billion?

Except that a) it hasn’t happened, b) doesn’t appear to be happening, and c) again
it takes more than 1-3 recruits like that to have an elite football team.

Wake me up when we have comparable money to pay a football team at the Oregon or UT level.

Having enough money to buy a 1-3 person basketball recruiting class is nowhere near the same as having the money to buy a Top Ten football recruiting class of 20+.

Tilman has enough to write a $25m check annually. And that would be more than what Ohio State used to fund their team this year.

But, yes. He has to want to do that.

And I haven’t even mentioned Mattress Mack yet. Who is funding a lot of this basketball NIL.

4 Likes

And therein lies the problem.

As you said, and as I’ve ALWAYS said, you need a) a lot of rich donors, AND b) they have to care enough about sports to fill the NIL honeypot sufficiently to pay 20+ top football recruits per year.

Isn’t happening, and there’s little to suggest that that will change.

Tilman isn’t paying enough NIL to provide that.

We’ll see if that changes in the future, but I’m not terribly optimistic.