Private Equity Coming For Pensions

I have 2 pensions. This doesn’t get me excited.

Private equity wants your pension

A brisk new trade in the financial futures of millions of retirees is unnerving some US workers, regulators, and politicians who worry that private equity firms will invest corporate pensions recklessly.

Recent lawsuits challenging AT&T, Lockheed, and Alcoa’s plans to turn their pensions over to Athene, which is owned by Apollo, casts a broader spotlight on private equity’s push into new corners of finance. Sen. Sherrod Brown has held hearings, cheered on by the Teamsters, and the Labor Department is weighing whether to require corporate pensions to at least consider whether an insurance business is owned by private equity before turning over its pensions.

Companies like AT&T and Lockheed don’t want to be in the retirement business. So they’ve been offloading their pension plans to insurance companies. The 773 deals last year broke 2022’s record of 568, according to Aon, which advises corporate pensions.

For years, the business of taking over those pensions was dominated by a handful of century-old insurance mainstays like Prudential and MetLife. But private-equity firms have barrelled in. Apollo, KKR, Brookfield, and Blackstone have all bought insurance companies since 2019, and have been bidding aggressively to acquire pension plans.

Over the past three years, about $135 billion of corporate pension liabilities have moved from America’s biggest companies to insurers. They are converted from corporate promises, vestiges of an era of generous paternalism, into an annuity, a type of insurance contract that has become the hottest product on Wall Street.

In the process, they lose the backing of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., a government entity that guarantees workers’ retirement benefits if their pension plans fail. Instead, any insolvency would be resolved by state insurance funds, which operate similarly to the FDIC’s fund for bank depositors and try to make as many people whole as possible from what’s left.

An Athene spokeswoman called the lawsuits “baseless complaints instigated by class action attorneys who are attempting to enrich themselves at the expense of retirees… Insurers like Athene have deep expertise in managing annuity obligations, are subject to robust regulation, and hold regulatory capital to protect policyholders.”

AT&T’s 96,000 retirees are clearly better off with Athene, an A-rated and well-capitalized money manager that reports to financial regulators, than with AT&T, a BBB-rated telecom company that left its pension underfunded for 11 of the past 12 years.

The question is whether they would have been better off with MetLife than with Athene.

Insurers owned by alternative asset managers invest more of policyholders’ money in things like bundled car loans or aircraft financing payments, and less in safer government bonds. They split from traditional players last year in opposing a rule that would increase capital requirements for those riskier and more complex investments.

They also eat a lot of their owners’ cooking: Dig out Athene’s holdings and you’ll see a lot of loans originated by Apollo. The same is true of American National, which is owned by Brookfield, or Corebridge, which is part-owned by Blackstone.

I’m not saying those are bad investments. But the average private equity-backed insurance company’s portfolio yields 0.62% more than that of a traditional firm, according to AM Best, a ratings firm for insurers. They say they can deliver that extra yield without any additional risk, which is, generally speaking, not how finance works.

Those insurers insist they’re no different than traditional players. “It’s not true that we’re ‘private-equity’ backed,” Wheeler, the Athene executive, said in his testimony. “We look a lot like Prudential, or MassMutual, or MetLife.”

He’s right, in that they’re subject to the same capital standards as MetLife or Prudential, and their portfolios need to pass the same safety checks.

But they’re different animals, with different priorities and DNA. KKR and Brookfield are dealmakers. They are good at finding investments like corporate loans and data centers and wind farms that produce profits down the road. For them, owning insurance policies and pension plans, which need profits down the road, is a way to pay for their deals. They are asset managers that play a little liability on the side.

State insurance regulators are pretty good at their jobs; about 30 insurers have failed this century, compared to 566 banks. “The regulators have the same toolbox, and an incredible amount of transparency … to feel confident about these transactions” involving PE-backed insurers, Mariana Gomez-Vock, of the American Council of Life Insurers, told me.

But mismanagement does sometimes get by them, and when it does, everyone wonders how.

How many Americans still have a pension coming to them from their employers?

It seems the number of pensioners will dwindle over the next 10-15 years.

Ahh Private equity the absolute peak of ultra rich scum and villany.

Not private equity

Capitalism lol

Nah capitalism is fine, best economic system for the most overall.

Private equity however has never contributed anything of value to society. They are capitalism’s poster children for it’s flaws

Capitalism is fine when it is independent of social/cultural elements. The wealth gap is continuing to increase with no end in sight

Private Equity is just as money hungry and greedy as any other industry, and it’s also a backbone of the economy as terrible as it can be

I was surprised when I received a letter from Hilton Hotels saying I was eligible for a pension. I haven’t taken it yet but will be forced to in a year. It isn’t huge but mailbox money is good. I worked for Hilton, on and off, from 1978 - 90

1 Like

Great. Yay socialism or communism.

Seriously?

I was involved in a business situation with a couple of dudes from Goldman Sachs. When it was over I realized that to work for Goldman you cannot have either a soul or a conscience.

3 Likes

I think anyone realized that in 2008

Goldman (and other banks + mortgage lenders owned by banks) preyed on vulnerable, low income communities by selling them subprime they know would default

They then securitized those very same mortgages knowing they were garbage, sold them to investors, and then shorted those very same securities via CDS

1 Like

Friday Humor


https://x.com/robertmsterling/status/1783695107981443091

Oh sure, we don’t need pollution controls, or safety stuff, or consumer rights. Those will come naturally in capitalism. Not.

1 Like

Yep, I too expect the lions to behave themselves around the gazelles unsupervised.

If they don’t there will be stern words for them.

1 Like

100% agree

Capitalism does not care about climate, racism, or mental health

Capitalism doesn’t have a conscience. It’s only need for existence is profit. Corporations take that a step further.

Only people make capitalism a semi-fair system. Hence, the social elements.

It’s been proven time and again. Left unchecked, it will devour. Chemicals will be dumped into rivers. Cars would be unsafe. Air will be polluted.

India is your example.

1 Like

Oh for goodness sakes. Capitalism is the worst system except for all the others.

Have you seen a socialist system work. Ever?

The reason socialists systems always have state secret police is because the people are so miserable and have to be controlled.

Go to Central Europe and tell them you don’t like capitalism. That you think more government control is in order. See what they say.

Again, it works as a concept independent of social elements.

From slavery, to Jim Crowe, and beyond, black people (and Hispanics, to an extent) have attempted over and over again to build wealth for themselves and it was either illegal, taken away, or stolen from them.

All the while the majority continued to build wealth to support the generations of people that followed them, and unfortunately, Capitalism continues to support this very system that makes it harder for minorities to get ahead.

How long will minority generations have to take care of their parents at the expense of their own children…

So yes, if everyone starts at the same level, then capitalism works in essence. However, that’s clearly not the case in America.

Capitalism works because that is who we are. We are traders, we have been traders since the dawn of man. It is who we are, we want to get paid for our work and if my work is better than his work I want to get paid more than him. It is hard wired into our DNA. We are not socialists.

Another thing that is hard wired into us is that we get better over time. Society gets better gradually and with fits and starts. We aren’t perfect, no society ever has been and no society ever will be. But we get better. We are are a far more fair society now than we were 150 years ago.

I’m not saying that socialism is better than capitalism.

But Capitalism is perpetuating continuous systemic inequity that is continuing to get worse.

That’s all I’m saying.

Generational wealth is a problem. Capitalism thrives when the cream rises to the top. Unfortunately with generational wealth the offspring of the wealthy are born on 3rd base where you and I have to circle the bases.

I am all for a hefty inheritance tax.

Have you met some of the children of wealthy people. Some are dumber than stumps.