Still think it was a bad move negotiate a deal into the ACC?
Even with that, they are still making MORE than had they stayed in the AAC and by the time the are fully vested…they may have multiple playoff appearances.
As i mentioned…their strategy was pure brilliance!
Really? smu has deep pockets, deep NIL pockets. We do not, hence the difference for now.
What smu did that was brilliant was to be associated with blue bloods like Clemson and fsu. The BIG12 does not have these two right now. The BIG12 needs to attract both Clemson and fsu. The BIG12 survival into being a power conference might (I am writing might) depend on it.
I guess it’s sorta cool to buy yourself a seat at the cool kids lunch table instead of deservingly getting invited.
But in the end, that’s also why the two coolest kids at that lunch table (FSU and Clemson) both got up and walked off in an attempt to move to an even cooler kids table. They didn’t want to be forced to sit next to an uncool dorky kid like SMU.
Personally, I’d have invited Bama to the playoffs over SMU. I suspect that they’d give Penn State a better matchup.
In the end, the ACC couldn’t get either a bid to the last playoffs, or a bye in this one, cementing their status as the weakest and least respected P4 conference; even the G6 got a bye over them.
As for SMU, kudos. You’re in the playoffs and will make less than other power conference teams for your efforts.
I know it has been said, but in the era of NIL, there will be no stopping SMU.
Get used to this. They have more money than anybody else.
SMU didn’t get the death penalty because they were cheating. Hell everyone was cheating including us. They were cheating at a level that UT couldn’t compete with so Texas used its media and NCAA influence to destroy SMU.
We are going to see what SMU would have become had they not gotten the death penalty.
Why the angst against the acc Ryon?
Since the bcs era you have three dominating conferences in the following order:
sec
acc with three NC
big10 with two NC
BIG12 with one NC
What comes before three? Two. What is higher than two? Three. Until then the big10 can pound sand.
It’s a good thing for SMU that the short term trends of the present always continue in linear fashion in perpetuity…
Come on, they were on an upswing anyway they have a good coach, and the ACC was ripe for picking this year… and they still didn’t win the game! FSU sucks, Clemson has 3 losses, Miami was a cheap suit. SMU is playing like us in 2015, or UCF in 2017. They just had more fortunate timing this year.
The acc will get back to you when you come up to their championships level.
It’s hilarious when us the BIG12 were relegated to a 12 seed and smu getting a bye?
Does the acc have two teams or not?
Does the BIG12 have one team or not?
I will write it again and again. Mr. Yormark goal is to get both Clemson and fsu to the BIG12. If he does not we are on path to both the BIG12 and acc to be left behind.
The Big 12 champ and a G5 champ both got byes over the ACC champ.
Speaks VOLUMES.
CASE CLOSED.
Don’t bet on the ACC’s long-term survival.
There’s a reason FSU and Clemson are suing. It’s because even when the win the ACC (which they did)…they can’t even get enough respect to get a bye over a G5 (see this year), or get a bid over a conference runner up (see last year); and then get to make less money for their efforts than UCF.