Space X does it again

They’re showing low earnings for their market cap in chart above too.

Returned with bio printed organ tissue and cartilage.

2 Likes

I don’t have any understanding of the bond market but this article indicates that SpaceX is going to need to burn a ton of cash over the years to try and reach profitability. The numbers are eye popping.

SpaceX connected company bought 3 acres with pump station next to, and one acre of the Navasota River for terafab semiconductor facility.

Elon Musk-connected company buys land, water infrastructure before Grimes County’s SpaceX tax vote Elon Musk-connected company buys land, water infrastructure before Grimes County’s SpaceX tax vote

Smart

SpaceX has test fired the booster for Starship test flight 7

1 Like

Went by SpaceX. Compared to a few years ago, the growth is amazing.

Now if they get a storm surge, they’re screwed

2 Likes

It’s only a matter of time, but I have to assume they’ve planned for that eventuality.

Next flight of starship will be flight 13; the
second launch of v3. Sometime in July tentatively. No attempt at landing catch of super heavy or ship either. Last time the booster came in hard to the gulf.

Flight 13 will mark a significant milestone as it attempts a full orbital trajectory for the upper-stage spacecraft. While the Super Heavy booster will target a splashdown in the ocean similar to Flight 12, the Ship component will fly into orbit to test new communications and flight profiles.

You brought up Eisner and Iger dustin in the same thought as Musk which ridiculous to the highest degree.
Where are Disney movies today?

I brought them up as their importance to their companies at the time. But to answer your off topic question of where are Disney movies today? Well, Toy Story 5 is at the top of the box office for the second week in a row.

Do you want to keep arguing about Disney and why Toy Story is #1 vs the other mega bombs that have cost Disney $B’s like Snow White and other major franchises?
Eisner and Eiger do not belong in the same discussion, not even remotely close.

I don’t think anyone wanted to argue about it except you. The comment you replied to hadn’t been responded to in two weeks.

1 Like

No, I think your tangent about Disney movies is off topic.

What I was comparing was large public companies where everything was based on one signular CEO or Chairman. I made stabs at comparisons, including Steve Jobs at Apple. It wasn’t in the context of what they did with their company or the current success/failures or whatever. It was their importance to the company and to the company’s shareholders at the time.

Elon Musk?
I see a “blend” of Henry Ford and Edison.

Interesting choices. I didn’t go that far back, because I was looking at more the modern era.

Edison and Henry Ford are timeless geniuses. They have changed our way of life by either invention or how they changed the manufacturing industry.

1 Like

They also had pretty significant dark sides. Some of that probably goes with the genius.