This definitely raises the bar on reputational trademark infringement

Gang,

Apparently Jack Daniels just lost its decade long fight against the “Bad Spaniels” parody dog toy.

I don’t know enough to weigh in on this topic but maybe they should have let that dog lie

3 Likes

EXALT!!!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I’m surprised they won initially, it is a clear parody.

Not a good sign for Buc-ees and their multiple harassing lawsuits.

1 Like

Difference is that in the case of the Buccee’s disputes some of those are competitors in the same marketplace with very similar names and marks, and that could cause confusion to consumers.

Not the case here.

This case wasn’t decided on that issue, but on a different one.

And that issue is that some parodies can go too far and cause reputational damage to the mark’s holder.

This appeals court reversed a trial court ruling to that effect.

I understand, but if you look at some of Buccee’s “confusion to consumers” examples, they are patently ridic.

It sucks, because Buccee’s is a beloved company that is doing a crappy thing.

I mean that’s their argument but you look at the majority of their suits it’s far more likely they are using their resources to crush competition by bringing costly lawsuits and drive folks out of business.

So they can Buc-off

You tell 'em Emmanuel. I actually agree on this one. Buccee’s has gone lawsuit-happy, and their case vs. that 1 little convenience store in Ohio makes it clear. Case of bullying

My understanding of Trademark law as a layperson is that if you’re not out there actively protecting your trademark, you could lose protection based on that. Its possible they are overly aggressive on this and also could very well be a bully here, I don’t know.

I’d actually respect that if they were close and needed protecting

Like the fight between Patagonia vs Pattie Gonia the drag queen. They’ve been using Patagonia’s logo, font, color way and similar name to sell merch and even applied for their own trademark under that name. That needs defending and suing to protect your IP.

Hell I’m on Buccees side when their is a real violation like against Born United.

That’s the mascot with a machine gun and different branding. And should get legal involved.

In Bucee’s case, I’ve seen some other gas stations that have VERY similar names; sometimes just the spelling is slightly different.

I can understand suing in that case. That’s what TM law is designed to protect the TM holder from.

Gang,

This was one of the seminal “reputational” parody trademark disputes.

Remember that song “I’m a Barbie Girl?”

Mattel sued over that. Courts held that that was protected 1st amendment parody.

Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. - Wikipedia.

1 Like

Well, I for one am happy. I mean, I’d hate to make the mistake of reaching for a dog toy when I want to pour a glass of whiskey.

If you do that, you probably already had too much Whiskey.

1 Like