First, this is going to be political but it deals with UH so it is relevant and should be discussed. I ask everyone to try to discuss this objectively and avoid partisan politics as much as possible here. Hopefully we can have a civil discussion on this.
The emailed form was titled, âA Primary Objective of Higher Education is to Enhance Critical Thinking.â
âOur responsibility is to give [students] the ability to form their own opinions, not to force a particular one on them. Our guiding principle is to teach them, not to indoctrinate them.â* Renu
My issue with this is that itâs a huge waste of time and taxpayer money. Everybody is taking these defensive measures to avoid retaliation from Republican politicians, but is any of this necessary? I never once encountered a professor who tried to âindoctrinateâ anyone on any subject. You can find an exception to the rule if you look hard enough, but this isnât a real issue that needs addressing (other than to appease the egos of small-minded individuals).
9 Likes
BayouCougar
(Denounce all racism and antisemitism.)
4
If teachers and professors had the kind of sway to manipulate and indoctrinate students, the use of deodorant by kids at school would be a sure thing. Yet they canât get kinds to practice personal hygiene.
Just more political theater to strive for conformity and eliminate critical thinking.
9 Likes
Duce630
(DustinK - Damn it feels good to be a Cougar. -Dwight Davis)
5
In other words, a solution in search of a problem. I can agree with that assessment.
4 Likes
BayouCougar
(Denounce all racism and antisemitism.)
6
Exactly. Similar to the proposed âFURRIES Actâ, which was a response to the debunked rumor that one kid somewhere used a litter box in a school one time. The bill failed, but we spent taxpayer money on this. I donât care if it was a dollar, any amount of money spent on stupid stuff like this is a colossal waste.
I am proud of our president,and our university. If you donât think there is propagandizing going on just look at the anti-semitic demonstrations, riots and vandalism occuring at some universities.
I am too, but that doesnât mean I have to agree with everything she and the school do.
University protests and demonstrations have always been a thing. Some of the current issues are different than they were 10/20/30 years ago, but the underlying concept is the same. The only difference is that we now have a president whoâs willing to use the weight of the federal government (and significant taxpayer dollars) to quash speech that he disagrees with.
As noted itâs a solution without a real problem. Also this will inevitably turn into âanything we donât like is 'evil indoctrination 'â Just like the words âsocialismâ is just code for things we donât like.
When i was a student at UH my economics professor told the class âDespite what your family has told you, greed is goodâ
I wonder how many students got indoctrinated that day
Iâm relieved itâs something relatively meaningless instead of whatâs happening at A&M and Tech, which are under hostile takeover from extremist politicians. If this keeps that kind of BS at bay, then be thankful.
6 Likes
BayouCougar
(Denounce all racism and antisemitism.)
15
Exactly. I tested my opinions against others (including professors) and if mine did not hold up I would have to reconsider my opinion or position.
I always thought universities were there to allow the exchange of ideas, even ideas one does not like.
It seems like it is actual indoctrination to demand standardized group think.
The goal is purely political too, one party does not like the fact that young voters do not vote their way and this is a âsolution looking for a problemâ to get young kids to vote their way.
Dumb and uneducated is now part of a certain parties platform.
And even where it did happen, itâs a stretch to assume that it was the result of professors âindoctrinatingâ students. Of all the places where students get information and opinions, professors probably have the least amount of time with them.