Always good to see progress, but keep in mind this ranking entity is not universally accepted as being reliable.
The reputation surveys have received severe criticism. QS do not reveal the response rates for the survey, but statements from QS indicate that they are very low (2–8 %),[7] which would make the results highly unreliable. Other commentators have pointed at the low validity of the survey, since few people know much about the quality of teaching and research at other institutions but their own.[35][36][37][38][39]
However, the issues extend beyond survey methodology. The QS World University Rankings have been criticised by many for placing too much emphasis on reputation, which receives 50% of the overall score. Some people have expressed concern about the manner in which the academic reputation survey has been carried out.[40]In a report,[41] Peter Wills from the University of Auckland wrote of the THE-QS World University Rankings:
But we note also that this survey establishes its rankings by appealing to university staff, even offering financial enticements to participate (see Appendix II). Staff are likely to feel it is in their greatest interest to rank their own institution more highly than others. This means the results of the survey and any apparent change in ranking are highly questionable, and that a high ranking has no real intrinsic value in any case. We are vehemently opposed to the evaluation of the University according to the outcome of such PR competitions.
Good question, and I don’t know that there is an answer. Here are
some of the ones you hear a lot about. Pros and con arguments
can be made for each based upon criteria used and weighting used.
In no particular order:
o Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), also known as the Shanghai Ranking
o QS World University Rankings
o Times Higher Education (THE)
o US News and World Report
o The Princeton Review
o Forbes America’s Top Colleges List
o The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
The Carnegie Classification was our first big move into its upper tier for Reasearch Activity. It’s based on research spending among other factors. Their highest tier is now called Research 1 but only requires a paltry spend of $50 million. So you have schools like UH ( >$200million ) lumped in with schools like Baylor that is only 1/3 that. There are now 187 institutions in US with the highest ranking