Say we don’t get screwed, force OT and win (or better yet win in regulation by going for 2). Would you rather that have happened and keep Dana (presumably) or would you keep history the same and see the T-sips/Whorn make the playoffs while getting rid of Dana?
That’s a really tough call but I’d rather win that game and have bragging rights and surely deny Whorn a trip to the playoffs.
It’s time to get back to playing championship football. Playing the spoiler role is for losers. Had we beat UT, Dana would have thrown an epic block party on his street but at the end of the day we still would have been a 5-7 team. The program is better off today than it was a week ago.
Yeah I think I prefer BCS or just the top two ranked in the country as opposed to a committee of friends of friends of certain schools. What I really would like is for a true playoff system like they have in the fcs.
Which decided to take Nebraska over a Colorado team that routed them just two weeks prior in 2001. Not to mention the controversy with Washington, Miami and Florida State, the latter of which was at the end of the transitive logic chain. Yeah, I’m certainly feenin’ for those days.
And nothing is stopping FBS teams from dropping down and participating in that “true” playoffs.
Georgia would get in over Texas and 'Bama? The transitive property is idiotic yet here is relevant, and Georgia is at the end of the chain among contenders:
Making a change at head coach doesn’t guarantee success. It’s fine to look for a silver lining in a loss, but I’d never trade a win for a coaching change, especially against UT. Not because it keeps them out of the playoff, but because winning is the point.