My Breakdown of our first game
Starter | Stats | |
---|---|---|
Walyn Napper | 14.6p 5.2r 6.0a | ; 6’1 pg top scorer/assist leader/top defender - poor shooter |
D. Houston | 7.2p 3.0r 2.4a | ; 6’1 guard - nothing too notable but his last name is houston and he is from houston |
J. Granlund | 4.4p 1.4r 0.6a | ; 6’6 Euro shooter but low volume |
M. Christmas | 8.8p 4.4r 0.6a | ; 6’6 Stretch 4, but more of a driver |
Elijah Tucker | 8.5p 4.8r 0.3a | ; 6’8 Xavier transfer; agile, not a shooter |
Rotational Bench | ||
Szymon Zapala | 12.2p 6.0r 0.2a | ; 7footer was starter for most of the season but benched to go small (not athletic) |
J. Massie | 9.8p 4.4r 1.6a | ; 6’6 Wing |
E. Richards | 7.2p 4.0r 0.6a | ; 6’4 wing |
note: the stats arent up to date, but i dont think up to date stats are that important to the analysis in regards to work needed to update
Short summary:
This team is a small, energetic group known for their defensive (at their level), primarily employing man-to-man, despite being a poor shooting team. Their offense leverages opportunities more than skill, with tactics including driving against weak defenders, shooting open three-pointers, passing to players cutting to the basket, or utilizing their 7-foot center’s size in post plays every now and then.
Resume evaluation:
Their record stands at 21-13, though this is somewhat misleading due to the high number of games against Division II schools. Within their mid-major conference, their record is only 6-11. However, they’ve shown promise recently, defeating the top two teams in their league in their last three games, including a significant victory over the league’s number one team their last game. Their performance against stronger non-conference teams, St. Bonaventure and Dayton, was respectable not getting blown out, they didn’t get embarrassed against the quality-ish teams theyve played.
Analysis:
It’s unlikely we’ll face much challenge from them. Their shooting struggles, lack of size, and offense reliant on exploiting weaker defenses don’t pose a threat to our well-rounded capabilities. Despite a solid defense, they’ve not been tested against an offense of our caliber, with several teams scoring over 80 points against them. Their three-point shooting (bottom 30 nationally in made 3s per game) and passing are notable weaknesses that will really work against them vs our style of play. and while they’re adept at drawing fouls, our depth is an issue, we’ll likely have packed up this game before that becomes an issue. Expecting a blowout win, as they don’t match well against our strengths, everything that defines them as decent (defense, rebounding, pg play) we are just better than them at it, and by many folds. they also arent built to really take advantage of our weakness
Prediction: lots of points our way, way less points for them