Anti-Palistinianism can be ignored

The Satellite
52

this is irrelevant

When you parrot Hamas propaganda, what else should I assume?

Israel didn’t start the war. Remember there was a cease fire on 10/6/23. When you have one side vowing to wipe out all the Jews, what else should I think?

Except it’s not a fact. You’re just parroting Hamas propaganda. Again, enforcing border security (when the people on the other side of the border wants to kill everybody on your side of the border) is not creating a prison. Again, they share a border with Egypt. Why only the condemnation of Israel? Gazans are not free to cross the border into Egypt even though the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt helps fund Hamas.

53

If the USA stopped financially supporting Israel tomorrow, would you be okay with China or Russia taking its place?

54

That’s a red herring and not even worthy of a response

1 Like
55

Ok. So it’s a red herring.

In that case, what do you think should happen with the Palestinians in Gaza then?

56

Step 1 - reject Hamas
Step 2 - live in peace

57

Ok

So let’s say Hamas is destroyed tomorrow in full (is this a red herring too?), are you fine with allowing Palestine to have its own economy and military without any Israeli influence?

As long as they promise peace with a treaty?

58

They already did….since 2005.

59

They allowed Gaza to build its own economy and have its own military without any Israeli influence or surveillance?

They don’t control any imports or exports?
They didn’t control maritime access? They didn’t control the air space?

60

Why would they need no survellance?
So they won’t build this
Inside the tunnels of Gaza Inside the tunnels of Gaza

61

So you want Palestine to live in peace while also having Israel have surveillance on Gaza?

62

America has surveillance on every country
If they want Peace what do Palestinians need to hide?

63

America is controlling other country’s imports and exports?

America isn’t allowing other countries to have a military or an airstrip?

Which countries are you referring to? (Unless you count tax dollars used to aid Israel’s control over Gaza)

64

I was just referring to surveillance.
Saying surveillance is a problem tells me they want to hide something.

1 Like
65

How so?

They hypothetically would’ve signed a treaty to be peaceful, subject to being allowed full autonomy over its economy and military.

So why would they need any surveillance?

66

Do you think America has no surveillance on Mexico?

67

I’m sure they do, but they don’t control their economy or their ability to build a military

And if there is surveillance, it’s pretty piss poor considering how Fent has killed so many Americans

68

You included surveillance. It seems like an unrealistic, outlandish demand to me.

1 Like
69

Ok so as i said… if Palestine agreed to peace with Israel subject to being allowed full autonomy of their own economy and military force, why would Israel need to have any kind of surveillance over Palestine? → They agreed to peace

If you’re suggesting that Palestine could potentially break that promise, then why would Israel ever grant them autonomy over their economy and military?

If Palestine never gets autonomy over their economy or military, then why should they be peaceful?

70

I believe we did the same thing with post war Japan and Germany. They turned out ok.

1 Like
71

Hey if you say so