sorry for challenging your victim complex earlier… please continue complaining that the 5 star players we’re getting aren’t rated high enough by a singular rating service just because they committed to UH. definitely NOT a bad look lol
His recruiting rating coming out of high school was 0.0001 lower than Henderson’s is right now. That’s not a meaningful differentiation if you’re making an apples:apples comparison.
He was the #3 rated QB in his class. He transferred because he got hurt and programs that recruit at A&Ms level move on quick. That doesn’t lessen his pedigree and besides that he’ll be a senior that already knows our system. That means he’ll be quite a bit ahead of KH.
yeah every top flight program that’s competing at an elite level has pipelines of 4 and 5 star talent for key positions that redshirt for depth and to develop.
My point is that Weigman was indeed a high rated recruit, but his career didn’t reflect that down the line.
Now perhaps bad luck (injuries) played a significant role along with inconsistency which he dealt with at A&M.
I’m not trying to dog Weigman. He’s why we are 8-2, but he’s also why we lot to WVU and almost lost to UCF. There are a few other select games where defense saved the day.
Weigman is not going to keep his job solely based on experience if he’s competing with Keisean. Carlisle? Yes. Keisean? No.
Henderson hasn’t played a down of college football (he hasn’t even played at a particularly competitive high school level), so it doesn’t make sense to drag Weigman for perceived weaknesses at the college level.
The two QBs were rated the same coming out of high school, and that’s the only comparison that can be made right now.