rtcoog, you want my opinion or do you want my opinion? You understand the nuance there?
The DOJ decided a few years ago to admit **every **single file, be true or not, verified, unverified. By doing so it opened the door for all kinds of speculations and innuendos.
Now it is you and Coogfans that have to interpret every post. Again, you tell us no politics but it has been political since the thread was restarted.
1 Like
Again, you seemed to want this several months ago. Something changed and you pivoted.
2 Likes
Dang, was just about to post those exact same quotes.
Definitely seem like an upset person IMHO and proof ( as much as can be in
this thread discussing multi potential pedos)
3 Likes
Maybe I’m misunderstanding the emotion, idk. I think most people would understand why I did if so.
3 Likes
Clearly no anger there, only an attempt to get you to direct your statements to me, since you were speaking about my posts. Then you told me to “settle down”. I’m not a child. I stand by my claim that you were being passive - aggressive. You claim no ill intent, so do I.
1 Like
It wasn’t clear to me but ok. Glad you’re not angry.
2 Likes
Yeah but then you’d have to get a new nickname for Putin, and we wouldn’t want to put that strain on you.
Applies to everyone, everywhere. If we all went to a watch party people would assume we’re all UH fans. Hang out with Jeffery Epstein, well you can see how it goes
4 Likes
I want absolutely everyone involved to go down.
4 Likes
I think you do a fair job of calling balls and strikes. I have seen posts from both sides flagged or removed. I guess if both sides are mad, you must be doing something right as a mod.
I find it interesting as well, 92010 was wanting the release of the files. Someone made a campaign promise on releasing those files. Suddenly, the person who won an election on that promise didn’t want the files released. Now that more parts have been released those who supported the files released suddenly want to pivot away and reset the bar, they will only accept a conviction. I guess you have to rationalize and twist into a pretzel to remain loyal and part of the cult of personality.
Woodmark is also suddenly quiet as well on this. And the Elon fan boys, what say you? Elon was begging to go to Epsteins wild parties.
Innuendos are cheap but go ahead with it. Innuendos are what the mainstream press thrives on.
…and all of a sudden they get hit by a monster lawsuit and lose.
1 Like
Kinda like the amount of money Fox News had to pay for their misinformation?
2 Likes
Yep, just like that. And just like the large amounts paid to Nick Sandmann.
1 Like
Two very different kinds of law suits but if all you have is whataboutisms you’re already losing.
But please tell me more.
3 Likes
You came with the whataboutism when innuendos were mentioned. Misinformation was the subject matter. Thanks for being the gatekeeper of false information
You’re welcome, here to do the lords work and leave the lawyering to actual lawyers.
Will get my vaccine booster at the half so I may get a better signal on my cell and make myself easier to track.
3 Likes
Or to distract from the Melania movie. It is not good.
.
.
.
.
.
When Kash Patel testified before the committee he said, “There’s no credible information that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked minors.”
Did he perjured himself in a sworn statement before Congress?
3 Likes
1000% yes
1 Like
The only way I can answer this question is with a gif
Isn’t that what everyone has been whining about? Release the files.
Whataboutisms galore! Or to distract from massive daycare fraud in Minnesota or hospice fraud in California. Plenty to get distracted from if one can’t focus. Why all the other whataboutism curveballs from the thread title?
1 Like