Regardless, I don’t think that matters in the grand scheme. It probably holds more weight historically, but in the age of NIL, schools that have been historically dominant (Clemson, Alabama, LSU, Auburn, etc.) but don’t have the pockets of Red McCombs or Tilman Fertitta have an uncertain future of remaining dominant….
UH doesn’t have UT pockets or even SMU pockets, but we still have pockets as well as having a valuable city in our backyard that are football fans.
I don’t agree with this. It takes a long time to enter blue blood status in basketball. I’ll try to find it, but there’s a chart that tracks basketball programs historical wins etc and their place in the “blue blood” race. We were pretty far back IIRC. It’ll take multiple natties to get there. Not refuting any other points, but don’t agree here.
I agree. UH is not any where near blue blood status even with recent basketball success. We had a chance in the PSJ/SWC days, but we got shafted in the end.
That being said, Nebraska and Pitt were once blue bloods but lost that status. Alabama is damn near at risk of losing it in the NIL age unless they have some donors we don’t know about.
The NIL essentially is going to change the landscape of blue bloods unless you’re a ND, UT, Ohio State or Michigan which have the alumni base and money to keep up.
All Alabama has is football. No money or academic prestige to back it up
@UH1927 here is the data. It’s pretty evident if you aren’t top right corner, you aren’t a blue blood. The programs that sit atop (Duke, UNC, Kansas, Kentucky) are regarded by most as the true blue blood programs. It takes decades of history and championships to get there. I’m not counting us out, but it’s gonna be a while before we get there.
The only B1G games that interest me are those that Illinois is involved in, and they don’t interest me as much as games UH is involved in.
Likewise, I have a much greater interest in Big 12 games that don’t involve UH than I have in any B1G game not involving Illinois.
Before 2015, when I started classes at Illinois, I had hardly any interest in the B1G.
If I weren’t a B1G alum, that’d still be the case.
I doubt that will change if the P2 ever broke away.
I’d still be mostly a UH fan.
I’m guessing that most people that aren’t either alumni of a P2 school, or a T-shirt fan of P2 schools located in states that have no NFL presence like Alabama or Mississippi are going to suddenly start supporting a P2 breakaway league in the same way that people support the NFL, which seems to be your presupposition.
I sure as Hell wouldn’t.
Had I not gotten a degree from a P2 school, then I probably wouldn’t follow the P2 at all if they broke away.
The policy change would allow either the president or the board of governors to stop a conference change. It comes at a time when Florida State is challenging the conference in court and the biggest brands in college athletics are concentrating in two major conferences — the SEC and the Big Ten.
As usual, I think both of you always engage in arguments that are never parallel. You’re both arguing mutually exclusive arguments
He’s right that if Ohio State or Penn St or Michigan came down to TDECU, it would no question be a sellout similar to UT last year.
Whether or not Houstonians or UH alumni watch B1G games regardless if UH is involved is really irrelevant in this context. In the case that UH was in the B1G, then you would see a higher interest in Non-UH B1G matchups because it’s the conference that UH would be in.
Youre using yourself as an example when you’re a unicorn in the grand scheme.
I would argue that the UI-Urbana alumni population in Houston is incredibly low. Not saying that as an insult, I’m just saying that UI-Urbana is a highly ranked academic school and most of its alumni most likely reside in the northeast if not in the Chicago area. (Funny enough one of coworkers graduated from UI Urbana oddly enough lol)
You can’t use historic examples to judge UH when UH is in a completely different era in its history in every vertical.
the general basis is vs a MEDIOCRE University of Houston squad.
Michigan fans, in Houston, would outnumber the UT fans that were here last season IF we were mediocre. A good UH squad would allow more of our fans to attend…but it will sell out regardless!
Iowa State/ Kansas State/ West Virginia/ Arizona/ Baylor/ Texas Tech/ etc. ain’t selling out TDECU vs a mediocre UH squad…not happening
That WHY you place your flag in the State of Texas…to get the B1G into the SECOND most populous state in the country!
Were UH in the B1G, we would be able to schedule, at best, one or two of the following at home per season: Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Nebraska.
Only THAT game or two would be a guaranteed sellout.
The rest of our B1G games would likely draw less than Tech, Okie State, TCU, or Baylor would, simply because those schools have far fewer alumni in the area and generate way less in the way of local fan interest.
In the end, attendance would not be greatly affected.
Only the SEC would generate a huge attendance boost.
UH isn’t a college town were the only thing to do on a Saturday is going to TDECU and party on campus all day
Houston has too many other distractions. That being said, even selling our the marquee games is good enough. I don’t think anyone would ever expect EVERY game to sellout unless we’re ranked. Also, the better the conference we are in, the better chance we can a schedule a non-conference marquee game
What hurt UH so much as a G5 is that we were to threatening for marquee schools to schedule us even as a G5.
Plans for that aspiration eventually to happen has been acknowledged by some pols in the future, if it’s lip service or something tangible, only time will tell . I’m sure UofH is going to keep the pressure to try to make it a reality.