LOL …‘no, that direct quote from me is not what I said…the point you made is what I said.’
Hilarious 
1 Like
Please chill with the political posts. I just deleted a couple that clearly were (second a response to first).
1 Like
Why are we allowing a post that shows journalists, so called journalists that have been debunked time after time? Why?
1 Like
Some of you think we telegraphed our attack or know better than Generals in charge.
Do you realize how that reads?
You know better than the pilots involved in this operation?
This is not qbacking. We all know what it is.
2 Likes
Were you there? Have you personally inspected and confirmed the damage? Do you have magic eyes that can see under ground, where others can’t? Have you learned nothing since W and the claim of WMDs?
One of the sources said Iran’s enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and the country’s nuclear program, much of which is buried deep underground, may have been set back only a month or two.
Is it obliteration if Iran’s Uranium is unaccounted for as well?
2 Likes
Israel knows we’re making assessments up…
1 Like
Just this morning " Its not a real assessment, but there needs to be an investigation into the leak of the clasified information regarding the assessment".
Which is it?
BTW, the Peace prize nomination, was withdrawn.
Why on earth is a pentagon leaking classified information?
Why? That is treason.
Any information can be interpretated and leaked how he/she wants it. That is obvious.
Anyhow, we bombed them and we will bomb them again. Does cnn have a trouble with that? Again this was 40 years overdue.
This discussion is pointless. You and others hate someone and nothing will make you and others applaud him.
1 Like
Hang on, first you said it was fake, debunked and total obliteration. Now it was leaked classified intel and treasonous, which makes it credible. Pick a lane, it can’t be both. We will wait.
1 Like
Well I remember my small part in the NATO mission to neutralize and dispose of chemical weapons removed from Syria 11 years ago. It was the stuff Assad crossed a red line with by using on his own people. It required a specialized lab, so it wasn’t just chlorine, it was the nasty stuff. The stuff he never showed the ability to produce domestically, that Russia doesn’t sell because they officially “don’t have any.”
The stuff that Hussein used to use in Iraq. The stuff that we found evidence of having been stored in caves near the Syria border not long before we invaded.
It’s not enough to win a criminal case with the rules of evidence, but it’s not no evidence either
Irony
1 Like
More irony
1 Like
Do you realize how that reads?
1 Like
First, if you served thank you for your service in Iraq.
I believe there were WMD but we never found actual proof.
But it was the suspicion of WMDs that was taken to congress to approve military action in Iraq.
The administration failed to go to congress and get authorization for a strike in Iran and that is a problem.
2 Likes
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, [1984]
3 Likes
Uh oh.
The Ayatollahs are pissed.
Assad’s Syria, not Iraq.
Under Obama, there was huge controversy over Assad’s use of chemical weapons against his own people
Those chemical weapons WERE confirmed.
Putin offered to take a bunch away.
Sadly, in 2017, attacks continued.
So after the press conference “it may be severe damage or not”
Glad that was resolved. /s
1 Like
Yeah it appears the damage was somewhere between total obliteration and minor setback. Total clarity
5 Likes