- Yes
- No
Why ban them? These are all professionals now. As long as they still have a 5th year and there is still a spot on the 105 man roster limit, what does it matter?
That’s basically what I said on another string.
Because it’s currently against the rules, kind of like gambling?
The more relevant question is why conferences should have to ban something that’s already banned.
You mean like pay-for-play? Pay for play and calling it NIL is also technically not allowed. In my opinion it is much worse than allowing a couple players back for their 5th year.
Tackle the bigger issues, then worry about small ones. So goes back to why ban them when there are much worse issues?
Do you have an example of a college player’s contract that shows that they’re being paid for playing?
Conferences are “banning” this because it’s against a fundamental rule
I voted “No” because we got Stephon back, otherwise I would have voted yes.
I doubt that you were the only one
Multiple things can be bad. If the conferences believe that this is a particularly low-hanging fruit, let them pluck it.
I don’t think the rule would apply to Johnson or the other incoming kid since neither signed NFL contracts or attended camps…that is my understanding. I would think the same goes for Weaver in hoops
No, those guys are depending on the injunctions that keep getting stayed.
I was told there would be no furor if LSU, specifically, skirted the rules and that people only wanted to keep Texas Tech in their place. What happened to that?
Are you that naive? You know that unicorns are not real right?
Irony…
You do know that some players have been paid under the table for decades?
Do you know what the inside of a Turkish prison looks like?
Have you ever seen a grown man naked?
Are 18- to 20-year-old males congregating in Marine Corps boot camp community showers considered grown men?
Do you like movies about gladiators?
Looks like I picked a bad day to quit sniffing glue.