I bet there was wire on top to tangle up those pesky drones, too. The FakeNewsMedia conveniently left that out.
6 foot walls he says? I mean I guess there lucky the Iranians didnât release a pack of over excited labs or something
Or Assault CamelsâŠ
Id bet the issue is mines.
Canât be, I was rod we took care of everything Iran had. Was I mislead?
If you look at the limited traffic moving through the Strait, all of it is hugging one of the coasts - none is going through the middle. The main part of the Strait is definitely off-limits.
What do we think happened to this bird?
I think we lost one back in late February, as well.
Iran may have figured out how to hack into these.
I understood per the article that the one on Feb 22 wasnât lost.
Or was that just military coverup ?
Anways these are expensive tools at $238 million each. And the AWACS we lost
on the ground at the airport may cost $750million to 1 billion to replace.
Being it turned towards Iran, Iâm suspicious they may have hacked it.
Iâm not claiming a cover-up, but Iâve seen lots of conflicting stories on this. The US has no reason to publicly admit any losses, so confirmation will be tough. It could be that none have actually been lost.
I think some of the confusion is because weâre using a couple of different types of drones.
- DT is crashing out on truth social
- Melania just issued a random, public statement on Epstein
- Lebanon was in fact a part of the ceasefire
What in the world is happening right now
Found his comments on X interestingâŠ
As a former SEAL that has sat in briefing rooms in theater, run ops against jihadist networks, and built a platform interviewing many sharp people in both operations and intelligence, you of all people should understand how strategic warfare actually works.
Despite all of that, you are sitting here and pushing posts like a cable news commentator with rimmed glasses on a communist news network, framing decisive pressure against the worldâs leading state sponsor of militant jihadist terrorism as âchaosâ and âloss.â
Letâs cut through this selective timeline you laid out:
DJT issued a brutal, unmistakable warning over the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint Iranâs regime was weaponizing to strangle global energy and fund its proxies.
That wasnât just some bluster for fun, it was quite literally combatant messaging 101 in asymmetric conflict against an enemy that only respects raw and credible power.
Jihadist Islamists like the IRGC, Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, and their ilk donât negotiate in good faith or respond to polite diplomacy, and you absolutely know this.
They only respond to negotiations from positions of strength.
If you do not negotiate that way, they will probe weaknesses, exploit hesitation, and interpret restraint as invitations to push attacks.
History from the Beirut barracks to the USS Cole to Benghazi and to decades of proxy attacks has proven that.
Youâve had guests that have spoken about these things, yet you act ignorant of them now?
This apocalyptic rhetoric is the only language these people understand, and you know it.
Iran blinked because of that rhetoric, floated a ceasefire tied to reopening the strait, and the administration secured a pause to lock in gains. That is not âlighting the world on fire then calling the fire department,â you two bit propagandist, that is literally the way war has always worked.
It is coercion through strength: downgrade the enemyâs capacity, signal willingness to escalate decisively, then offer the off ramp on your terms.
Itâs wild that you are ignorant about this.
And then you cry about Israel hitting Beirut like the soft lefty you have turned into⊠Beirut is in Lebanon, mind you, which is a completely different country than Iran.
Perhaps you need a geography lesson as well as a lesson on strategic level warfare?
So yeah, that is not DJT chaos, that is Israel finishing the job against an Iranian proxy that has quite literally fired thousands of rockets and embedded itself among civilians in Lebanon for decades.
And Lebanon was explicitly carved out of the US and Iran ceasefire for a reason, so even bringing it up here is silly and meant to distract.
Also, Iran quickly âclosedâ the Strait back up because they are purveyors of taqiyya style negotiations, just like jihadists always are.
But letâs talk about how they âclosedâ the Strait, because everyone is being dishonest about that as well.
They didnât actually close anything, they are just signaling that they will attack ships that cross through it.
All it takes is one drone or one missile hitting one tanker and 20% of the worldâs oil shipping halts until insurance companies feel confident that the crazy Islamic terrorist regime in Iran wonât sink any more hundred million dollar tankers.
You also conveniently leave out the real reason for this war from the get go, which is curtailing China and Chinaâs Belt and Road Initiative and re-establishing the world order firmly behind the United States.
I miss the days just months ago when you werenât a fully captured op⊠seeing what you and guys like Kent have become is truly disheartening.
I hope the money is worth it
Could we get some context? Like who is this guy and who is he responding too?

I think Melania needs her own thread now. What the heck was that? Why is she coming out all of a sudden? Something big must be coming out.
Whoâs he?
I havenât seen this discussed much. Iran has apparently continued attacking oil infrastructure sites that have impacted at least 1.2MM bpd. There are some reports of other sites being attacked over the last couple of days, but I donât know the confirmed details.
Yikes, thatâs some floundering. He knows they are but donât think he knows what to do right now.
Wasnât he musing about a joint venture with Iran to collect these fees just yesterday? ![]()
