Generally, I’ve really liked consumer reports but I’m curious whey they’re only dealing with %'s & number of possible problems instead of actual maintenance costs?
I’ve seen countless stories from people who have had great success, monetarily speaking, with EV’s over time and maintenance costs are a big plus in every one. How is this suddenly reversed? Did they actually to a cost analysis or are they just looking at potential problems?
Electric motors are much more cost effective than combustion engines. That’s why the process to extract, move, & process oil for engines is done primarily (almost entirely really) with electric motors.
That’s not the purpose of the CR report. They are able to determine what problems you can expect with a vehicle based on the reader’s responses. If the cooling system has issues in a 1999 Toyota Corolla, then when considering buying one, you check it out. So if an EV has brake issues and you’re looking to buy a used one, you get your mechanic to check it out.
Interesting, could be a whole new new industry in the US for extraction/mining plus refining.
Did not realize China did 90% of the worlds refining of lithium today.
The Saudis could stop US production just by increasing production. Threshold for making money in the USA is between $50 & $66/bbl. Guyana is about $35/bbl and it will continue to grow unless Venezuela attacks Guyana.
No, they were concerned about the growth in shale. Back then, break even was close to $60. Saudis pushed the price below that. Really crushed a nascent industry, took a long time to come back. Of course, COVID was a double whammy.
Can they put a hurt on the USA? Sure. The breakeven has dropped and the companies aren’t as heavily leveraged due to ESG cutting investments in O&G.