Fact is, when your university is located in a major urban area with a bunch of traffic, AND when it has two large state flagships, it is very difficult for you to get those students to switch from the flagships to the urban institution. It just is.
The reason UCLA can do it is because (i) CA is a large state that is geographically long; so SoCAL is very different from NoCAL. (ii) UCLA IS one of the flagships. It is like TAMU to Berkley’s UT.
A better comparison for UH is one of the other great UC system schools, like UC Davis, UC San Diego, Riverside or Irvine, all of which are AAU members. What are there numbers like? Well according to the most recent data, UC San Diego has only 31% on campus living, UC Irvine has 48%, Riverside 34%, and UC Davis 38%.
Anyone who has spent any time in CA should not be surprised by these numbers. Irvine is in Orange County, a relative well off area. So, not shocking that people would choose to stay on campus. Riverside, however, is notoriously not that nice, so not a surprise that a lot of people choose to commute. Also, Riverside is part of the “Inland Empire” and draws a lot of students from lower middle class areas in that region. UCSD? Sort of like Houston: located in a major urban area. However, unlike Houston, San Diego’s traffic is light compared to Houston, and its not nearly as spread out. I say this as someone whose cousin went to school there. UCSD is technically not in San Diego, but in La Jolla which is a very expensive area. Any housing that would be built probably would cost so much that very few students could afford it.
UC Davis is sort of like Texas Tech; its located in the north central part of the state near Sacramento and is semi-rural. Not a surprise that many would choose to live on campus, as many UC Davis students come from Northern CA. In fact, some people refer to UC Davis as “California A&M”, since it started as an agricultural of the UC System.
There are a few other UC branches that are also AAU: UC Santa Barbara and UC Santa Cruz, which have 38% and 51% of students living on campus, respectively.
Let’s look outside of the UC System.
Pitt - 42% on campus
Maryland - 38% on campus
Utah - 17% on campus (less than us)
UI- Chicago - 15% (less than us).
UIUC - 50%
Georgia State - 20%
Cincinnati - 25%
All of the schools listed above are AAU member and/or Tier 1 research universities, yet the number of students living on campus varies considerably. UI-Chicago I think is a great comparison for us, because it is located just outside downtown Chicago and has received huge investments from the state of Illinois, and it’s academic rep has risen dramatically. It has risen so much, that it is actually getting close to UIUC! It is now the 76th ranked university in the country, overall. Not just public universities, but of all universities. It is the 40the ranked public school. If you look at its student body, it is a mirror image of ours. That should be our goal.
Point is, we need to compare apples to apples, if we want to get a good idea of who and what we are, where we can realistically be, and therefore, what we need to do to get there. Trying to turn UH into UT-Houston is not going to work.