OT: NIL — Michigan Offers QB $10.5 million to Flip LSU Commitment

Basketball is easier because you only have to sign a few players per year.

Even Gonzaga and other non football schools can manage to win at that.

I’m sure we can come up with enough NIL money to sign 2-3 good HS basketball players per year.

Football is different though.

It takes dozens and dozens of players. I doubt we can come up with enough NIL money to keep up with the big brands in that.

Again, the current football Top Ten shows that NIL is NOT creating parity. Quite the opposite actually. Rich getting richer.

The equalizer for UH is our advantage in the transfer portal.

no they wont.

After 5 years of a much higher payroll in the SEC/B1G (as the new system will have) and more playoff slots written into the rules, all the top players will be in those two conference. A cinderella year here and thee yes, but not equals. It will force a P2/M2 division. Need to have balance and limits written in to keep parity between the top and middle conferences.

except it is not the same as in the past. Bag money will not be close to the $20 million in revenue sharing plus another $20 million in “NIL” from donors every year. Not even close to equal money. Wait until full donor fatigue sets in.

2 Likes

You must blind…because I don’t remember a recent history where Indiana, SMU and BYU had a legitimate path to a NC in mid November

Important to remember that:

  • the new huge media contracts for the B1G and SEC are just now kicking in.
  • Revenue sharing does not start until next year (and they have not finalized if it is a fixed amount or percentage of revenue (percentage very bad for those with lower media contracts)
  • “NIL” is still just being figured out
  • Rosters going to 105 will also mean more money for scholarships to budget for
  • 4 guaranteed playoff spots vs 2 is only discussion right now not reality (yet)

UH (and most other B1g 12/ACC schools) are barely keeping up with “NIL”. How are they going to add another $20 million for revenue sharing when they can’t keep up without it?

Exactly!

Fatigue will set in plus the deals will become less player friendly because they will be chalk full of specific business clauses/ expectations and will be backed by severe legal consequences

The early days of the money pot Wild West are coming to an END!

1 Like

Hopefully.

Need to work to have balance written into rules, not unequal rules. I do hope that one day NIL is treated as NIL the way you have described (and I earlier threads). It is not treated that way right now which is the problem.

It can work if done fairly and not by greed.

1 Like

BYU is often ranked, and Indiana, again, is in the RICHEST conference.

As I said, rich getting richer.

SMU isn’t in the Top Ten and is literally the exception that proves the rule in the Top 15.

No parity.

Alabama has multiple losses, FSU is god awful, Florida sucks and LSU is mediocre, Oklahoma is horrible.

Seems like the mighty have been brought down to me!

Viva La Parity!!

Didn’t Byu do a team nil where they pay the whole team a certain amount and Byu is doing great.

How many of the Top Ten AREN’T either big brands or from the richest conference?

Hint: NONE!!!

No parity.

A few blue bloods being down isn’t evidence of NIL parity when other rich brands have simply taken their place.

1 Like

Only thing is now it’s possible for a g5 to pay and win where before they couldn’t compete with bag money. If moores wants to he could throw money to San Diego state for ex where before they get hammered if money is put by a tree like the sec did.

Saban didn’t like the nil bc players only wanted money but also he knows now anyone can pay if they can and want to.

I do think the nil is a waste of money and if done they should pay the whole team like Byu bc it’s cheaper at 30k a pop vs 5 mil to 1 guy.

Why do some of yall want the government to come and ‘fix’ this. When does the government ever fix anything?

Also, why are yall crying about it being fair? Who said it had to be fair? Try harder. Spend wisely. NIL doesn’t need regulation, it needs less.

Players should get whatever they want. As I type this the espn banner just said the Indiana coach just got a 64 million dollar extension. Let the players make whatever they want.

1 Like

Just like the coaches.

1 Like

Exactly.

Exactly.!

What is the Government supposed to fix?

This is a voluntary welfare exchange from the rich to the poor or from the rich to rich.

There is NOTHING to fix.

There is no excuse for making a bad business deal which is what 99% of NIL donors are doing right now.

The Government is laughing their A off right now :rofl: :joy:

NIL and U of H?
Let’s think about this. There is one individual that is officially tied to our school. Therefore he can not be the NIL donor that we all want. But…as soon as he is no longer officially associated with U of H is it far fetched to forecast that our NIL piggy bank will change for the better?
The so called big schools always have had mega donors. Yes we can dream but this is indeed a real possibility that this can happen.

How about, at the end of each FB season, the top 24 teams are placed into a “Big Dog” division. They can ONLY play other teams in said division and top 6 teams from that division go to the 12 team playoff. Same thing next year. Rinse and repeat.

The name Underwood is worth 10 million ? ? ? ? ?Just curious, is the NIL supposed to act as a go between players and “advertising” opportunities ? ? ? ? ? Pay for play is still illegal, as I understand it, so players name should be used to benefit the payor in some manner, or players image should be used to benefit the payor in some manner, or the players likeness, yada yada yada. Is this the intent of NIL? Is this what is happening? Or is NIL just a cover for play for pay, which should be illegal for an amateur athlete. JMHO

T&F has been pro since forever. Underwood may have to go to a couple of birthday parties or do a commercial. Nothing illegal about it, and the NCAA was whacked in court the first time they tried to stop it. It is impossible to show pay is tied to actual play unless a NIL contract has performance clauses, which they don’t.