Disagree. While the importance of the bowl games might be diminished, it’s important for the players who remain as it gives them the chance to show their skills and become starters for the next season.
I will be at any bowl game U of H plays at next season.
Coogs
Nick Saban just made a couple of points on the portal being in December
It is based upon the school year. It allows the players to attend their new school starting in January which allows them to participate in spring practice
NCAA won’t make any changes because they would be sued.
Congress needs to provide national law to provide boundaries
The ideal fix would be a collective bargaining agreement. Hard to do because players do have a union/players group
really ? you’re playing in the CFB with a reasonable shot at winning it and maybe again next year and it’s not good enough ? between the portal and , the ncaa has created a monster.
It was the backup QB for PSU. He didn’t want to but if he stayed he would lose lot of opptys out there. HC supported him n felt terrible abt situation. They must Close the TP during December & CFP period. Basically till end of season. A College Commish is needed in bad way. All Playoffs coaches are complaining.
Bowl games will be around as long as they are profitable (like everything else). What makes them profitable is mostly TV distantly followed by attendance.
I think the bowl games are simply more football for people who enjoy college football. I mostly watch the games that interest me, but occasionally I’ll stumble across a game (like the Ohio-Jax St game mentioned in this thread) that is entertaining.
It stinks if your team loses key players before a bowl game, but until they change the rules it’s part of the landscape. The vast majority of bowls are glorified exhibition games, anyway, but they can be fun. I just want to see the Coogs in a bowl again!
It doesn’t surprise me if the bowl games die off. The playoffs, NIL, and the portal are the forces that will put an end to them (or at a minimum, slow down their expansion). Players won’t risk playing in them if they “don’t count” (which non-playoff bowls will be) and only provide more health risks than anything else, particularly if the player wants to go to the portal (possibly for NIL reasons), or doesn’t want to risk an NFL career blowing out a knee at the “Whatever” bowl.
The reason that bowls existed in the first place was as a draw for teams to play that normally don’t play, sponsored by a business interest and a Chamber of Commerce in a town with a large enough stadium for a needed boost in tourism dollars from out-of-towners somehow associated with the colleges (that’s why a team had to “travel well”). Of course, it needed to be the “best of the best” (most times): a Conference champion against another Conference champion, and usually the city was in the Sun Belt - not up North - so those fans wouldn’t freeze going there to watch the game. The bowls provided fan insight into these teams they didn’t normally see during the regular season. In other words - an economic model of the 1920s - 1940s/50s (mostly). And if you look at the more prestiguous bowls and how they started (and even the less prestiguous ones), you see that exact model.
The economics of NCAA football (and American economics in general) has moved on. Yeah, it sucks, but I don’t see a credible way of it coming back.
If I was a bowl chairman, given the way the economics has evolved, I’d start looking at hosting college teams in the pre-conference/early season lineups, and forget about the end-of-season stuff. There’d be more interest in the early games than the end of season games.