I said it was unrealistic, not unprecedented. If your only cited data point is 22 years old, and it’s Tim Duncan, I think you’re reinforcing the idea that expecting top end talent to stay 4 years is unrealistic. Sure it could happen but it’s very unlikely.
It’s not foolish because Duncan went on to become one of the greatest PF’s of all time. If he turned his knee to pudding, and went on to become Tim Duncan: Regional Sales Manager then it would’ve been exceedingly foolish.
Just listened. That should tell you pretty much all you should know. It’s the expectation that Quentin is playing this season. Will be an absolute shock if he is not.
Very true if you are a lottery pick or heck 1st Rd pick that is life changing money even if you flop. Going back is tricky because usually the kids dont improve enough to make a huge jump. It usually exposes more flaws and allows the scouts to nit pick you more. Daniel Gafford(Arkansas) comes to mind recently where he was a 1st Rd pick a yr ago but stayed and became a 2nd Rd pick.
That could be because the year he actually came out for the draft has a lot of talented players, more than the previous year. The only way to know if staying in college a year or two longer is a better thing for a kid to do is to look into the success rate of top 10 high school kids who chose to stay in college 2 or more years versus the one-and-done kids.
That’s why I hope the NBA goes with the baseball model of either drafting kids directly out of high school, or kids have to stay two years if they go to college. Allows the kids that have no interest in school to go and make money somewhere and takes some of the pressure off the kids that go to school since they know they’ll be there at least two years.