Yes, he is. And then when I point out the ancient theft he has to ignore it and even says that…‘naaa those old victims don’t exist so it’s ok!!’
Turns out …they’re still around …
1 Like
No, I’m simply debunking Coogcheese’s lame attempt to claim theft.
That’s dumb.
1 Like
No, you’re justifying modern day theft with flawed ancient reasoning.
That’s dumb and absurd.
3 Likes
So biblical titles beat out modern law?
It’s at the heart of Anti-Palistinic beliefs so he can’t see past it
1 Like
No, a historically well-documented theft by Arab invaders is simply being redressed.
Nothing Biblical involved.
1 Like
And before that, a well documented theft is land by Israelites.
Again, not sure the Old Testament counts as well-documented.
Got any other source?
Didn’t think so.
1 Like
The Old testament is literally what they used to justify Israel coming back into existence
Now…to end this… they are all the same people really…
“Archaeological and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites, who extensively mixed with Egyptians”
So the only thing that should matter is modern day history and NONE of the theft can be justified.
1 Like
Those Palestinians are Arabs Bro.
Arabs invaded beginning in the 600s.
Jews were there FAR earlier.
Give it up Bro.
1 Like
Give it up bro…they documented stealing the land themselves. It’s what they wrote down and believe. Your argument requires them to stop believing their religious beliefs. It’s nuts.
2 Likes
It’s not any more reliable documentation than that of Adam, Eve, and Noah would be.
In other words, it’s NOT.
The Arab invasions/theft from the 600s AD onward is far better documented and UNDisputed in history.
Again, give it up Bro.
1 Like
I’m just over here laughing because your entire argument depends on Jewish people’s own written history being false.
They’re written history by the way is backed up with DNA evidence.
1 Like
If that was true then they would have no claim to the land.
Also do you really want to set the precedent that all conquered land in the past is up for grabs to those who had ancestors there?
3 Likes
It’s not history.
It’s simply a religious text.
Sure they would.
Jewish presence in that area is well documented in history and archaeology from sources outside the Bible……and predates the Arab invasions/theft by thousands of years.
Jewish claims there aren’t based purely on the Bible.
If you think that, then you are pretty ignorant.
2 Likes
I’m telling you he’s going to lose his land as soon as some native Americans read this thread.
2 Likes
So far no Native American has showed up to challenge my title or claim.
When they do, we’ll take it up in court.
I don’t see them prevailing.
Ain’t happening.
1 Like
In addition to documenting how they stole the land they documented how they murdered people along the way. I don’t think they would have done that if it wasn’t true.
1 Like